That tube has 2 diodes as you've seen...and usually only one is used.
Check the print... sometimes they tie both together.
If you really suspect this as the problem.. you can simply use the other diode.
But the problem may be elsewhere.
:Thanks,
:
. |
:Have you already replaced all the old paper caps?
:If not do that.
:Especially the coupling cap feeding the grid of the output tube.
:
:
Detector diodes can test very weak and still operate perfectly well.
Norm
:Have you already replaced all the old paper caps?
:If not do that.
:Especially the coupling cap feeding the grid of the output tube.
:
:
Thanks gentlemen.
So I tried aligning the set, although at times a bit noisy from static. There was some fading in and out of signal but was able to achieve a little bit better alignment than original settings. When adjusting the primary IF there was increase in static/cut out of signal. Clue?
On a strong signal the radio performs fairly good , although I have not had it on for more than 15min.
On weaker signals the noise level increases plus more prone to total fade out.
My current thinking is that there is mica disease in IF 1. (thanks Warren for mentioning this.) Any thoughts?
Other question: This receiver had a 4 part electrolytic. I wired the negative connection , tacking the smaller valued ec’s neg to the 70mfd neg and then routed this to the original neg connection. Any problems caused by this method?
Thanks.
Could you have outside interference? Computers, lights, motors, other electronic equipment all cause noise that will be noticed more on weaker signals. Weaker stations may also fade in and out.
Silver mica disease usually causes static crashes, similar to lightening. With a meter you may be able to measure a slight positive voltage on secondary of IF Transformers.
Norm
:Well, here is where I am at on this Arvin.
:1. New coupling cap on 50c5 checked out ok.
:2. Grid voltage in relation to cathode was very close to 5v at 4.9v.
:3. B+ seems good throughout the set. To pin 7 of 12AT6 that Warren mentioned was 48v….calls for 54.
: Also the 330k resistor coming off pn 7 is within tolerance.
:
:So I tried aligning the set, although at times a bit noisy from static. There was some fading in and out of signal but was able to achieve a little bit better alignment than original settings. When adjusting the primary IF there was increase in static/cut out of signal. Clue?
: On a strong signal the radio performs fairly good , although I have not had it on for more than 15min.
:On weaker signals the noise level increases plus more prone to total fade out.
:My current thinking is that there is mica disease in IF 1. (thanks Warren for mentioning this.) Any thoughts?
:
:Other question: This receiver had a 4 part electrolytic. I wired the negative connection , tacking the smaller valued ec’s neg to the 70mfd neg and then routed this to the original neg connection. Any problems caused by this method?
:Thanks.
: