Home  Resources  References  Tubes  Forums  Links  Support 
Tuning meter on Stromberg-Carlson Model 29
6/15/2010 6:17:04 PMBill VA
I have the radio playing loud and clear, getting every watt out of the 45's. The pointer takes up position about 1/4 from left. It barely moves when tuning a station. How do I get more "swing to the right" from it? Otherwise more visual tho it does peak when right on.
Bill
6/18/2010 10:38:15 AMLewis L
:I have the radio playing loud and clear, getting every watt out of the 45's. The pointer takes up position about 1/4 from left. It barely moves when tuning a station. How do I get more "swing to the right" from it? Otherwise more visual tho it does peak when right on.
:Bill
:
On that receiver, the AVC controls the gain of the RF and converter sections by driving those tubes toward cutoff, which lowers the current they draw, so we have two possibilities here, the AVC or one (or both) of the front end tubes. A third possibility is the meter itself, but not very likely. I don't know what the AVC should go down to (negative Voltage, y'know) but I woruld suspect that firsst, then the tubes.
Lewis
6/18/2010 11:00:02 AMBill VA
::I have the radio playing loud and clear, getting every watt out of the 45's. The pointer takes up position about 1/4 from left. It barely moves when tuning a station. How do I get more "swing to the right" from it? Otherwise more visual tho it does peak when right on.
::Bill
::
:
:
:
:
:On that receiver, the AVC controls the gain of the RF and converter sections by driving those tubes toward cutoff, which lowers the current they draw, so we have two possibilities here, the AVC or one (or both) of the front end tubes. A third possibility is the meter itself, but not very likely. I don't know what the AVC should go down to (negative Voltage, y'know) but I woruld suspect that firsst, then the tubes.
:Lewis
:
I have checked the tubes over and over and they are fine, life test ok. I measure about 1 and third negative volts. I do think it should be higher. I used new caps but now I'm thinking about lowering the value of caps involved in the AVC and see what happens. The schematic is hard to read and based on what I measured the old ones and a guess I could be off. I did look at the other similiar Stromberg schematics. I do know the set plays loud and clear. The meter reads about 850 ohms if I recall right.
Bill
6/18/2010 12:37:42 PMLewis L
:::I have the radio playing loud and clear, getting every watt out of the 45's. The pointer takes up position about 1/4 from left. It barely moves when tuning a station. How do I get more "swing to the right" from it? Otherwise more visual tho it does peak when right on.
:::Bill
:::
::
::
::
::
::On that receiver, the AVC controls the gain of the RF and converter sections by driving those tubes toward cutoff, which lowers the current they draw, so we have two possibilities here, the AVC or one (or both) of the front end tubes. A third possibility is the meter itself, but not very likely. I don't know what the AVC should go down to (negative Voltage, y'know) but I woruld suspect that firsst, then the tubes.
::Lewis
::
:
:Thanks Lewis,
:I have checked the tubes over and over and they are fine, life test ok. I measure about 1 and third negative volts. I do think it should be higher. I used new caps but now I'm thinking about lowering the value of caps involved in the AVC and see what happens. The schematic is hard to read and based on what I measured the old ones and a guess I could be off. I did look at the other similiar Stromberg schematics. I do know the set plays loud and clear. The meter reads about 850 ohms if I recall right.
:Bill
:
Lewis
6/18/2010 12:50:35 PMNorm Leal
Hi

Right, AVC goes negative when stronger stations are tuned in. Takes a good antenna, strong station and alignment to get the most meter movement.

In this radio the meter moves by reduction of plate current in the RF and Mixer stages. Are proper, good tubes in these stages? Sometimes 24A and 35 are interchanged. Either may work for sound but not meter operation.

The schematic shows resistors as .5 ohms etc. This is an error. Resistors marked like that should be shown as meg.

http://www.nostalgiaair.org/PagesByModel/436/M0021436.pdf

Norm

::::I have the radio playing loud and clear, getting every watt out of the 45's. The pointer takes up position about 1/4 from left. It barely moves when tuning a station. How do I get more "swing to the right" from it? Otherwise more visual tho it does peak when right on.
::::Bill
::::
:::
:::
:::
:::
:::On that receiver, the AVC controls the gain of the RF and converter sections by driving those tubes toward cutoff, which lowers the current they draw, so we have two possibilities here, the AVC or one (or both) of the front end tubes. A third possibility is the meter itself, but not very likely. I don't know what the AVC should go down to (negative Voltage, y'know) but I woruld suspect that firsst, then the tubes.
:::Lewis
:::
::
::Thanks Lewis,
::I have checked the tubes over and over and they are fine, life test ok. I measure about 1 and third negative volts. I do think it should be higher. I used new caps but now I'm thinking about lowering the value of caps involved in the AVC and see what happens. The schematic is hard to read and based on what I measured the old ones and a guess I could be off. I did look at the other similiar Stromberg schematics. I do know the set plays loud and clear. The meter reads about 850 ohms if I recall right.
::Bill
::
:
:
:
:I am not sure about that AVC Voltage, seems to me it should be lower (more negative) if you have a fairly strong station. Help, anyone?
:Lewis
:

6/18/2010 2:49:19 PMBill VA
Norm, the tubes tested on 533A. I can test them again. No 24A in place of 35. Tho I had thought about trying one. So thanks for the warning. The strongest station around here is 820 and it is very close. It does cause the most meter deflection but less than 1/8 inch movement. No problem with reading the resistor value as all old dogbone type were clearly marked.
Bill

:Hi
:
: Right, AVC goes negative when stronger stations are tuned in. Takes a good antenna, strong station and alignment to get the most meter movement.
:
: In this radio the meter moves by reduction of plate current in the RF and Mixer stages. Are proper, good tubes in these stages? Sometimes 24A and 35 are interchanged. Either may work for sound but not meter operation.
:
: The schematic shows resistors as .5 ohms etc. This is an error. Resistors marked like that should be shown as meg.
:
:http://www.nostalgiaair.org/PagesByModel/436/M0021436.pdf
:
:Norm
:
:::::I have the radio playing loud and clear, getting every watt out of the 45's. The pointer takes up position about 1/4 from left. It barely moves when tuning a station. How do I get more "swing to the right" from it? Otherwise more visual tho it does peak when right on.
:::::Bill
:::::
::::
::::
::::
::::
::::On that receiver, the AVC controls the gain of the RF and converter sections by driving those tubes toward cutoff, which lowers the current they draw, so we have two possibilities here, the AVC or one (or both) of the front end tubes. A third possibility is the meter itself, but not very likely. I don't know what the AVC should go down to (negative Voltage, y'know) but I woruld suspect that firsst, then the tubes.
::::Lewis
::::
:::
:::Thanks Lewis,
:::I have checked the tubes over and over and they are fine, life test ok. I measure about 1 and third negative volts. I do think it should be higher. I used new caps but now I'm thinking about lowering the value of caps involved in the AVC and see what happens. The schematic is hard to read and based on what I measured the old ones and a guess I could be off. I did look at the other similiar Stromberg schematics. I do know the set plays loud and clear. The meter reads about 850 ohms if I recall right.
:::Bill
:::
::
::
::
::I am not sure about that AVC Voltage, seems to me it should be lower (more negative) if you have a fairly strong station. Help, anyone?
::Lewis
::
:

6/18/2010 5:51:47 PMEdd
:Norm, the tubes tested on 533A. I can test them again. No 24A in place of 35. Tho I had thought about trying one. So thanks for the warning. The strongest station around here is 820 and it is very close. It does cause the most meter deflection but less than 1/8 inch movement. No problem with reading the resistor value as all old dogbone type were clearly marked.
:Bill
:
::Hi
::
:: Right, AVC goes negative when stronger stations are tuned in. Takes a good antenna, strong station and alignment to get the most meter movement.
::
:: In this radio the meter moves by reduction of plate current in the RF and Mixer stages. Are proper, good tubes in these stages? Sometimes 24A and 35 are interchanged. Either may work for sound but not meter operation.
::
:: The schematic shows resistors as .5 ohms etc. This is an error. Resistors marked like that should be shown as meg.
::
::http://www.nostalgiaair.org/PagesByModel/436/M0021436.pdf
::
::Norm
::
::::::I have the radio playing loud and clear, getting every watt out of the 45's. The pointer takes up position about 1/4 from left. It barely moves when tuning a station. How do I get more "swing to the right" from it? Otherwise more visual tho it does peak when right on.
::::::Bill
::::::
:::::
:::::
:::::
:::::
:::::On that receiver, the AVC controls the gain of the RF and converter sections by driving those tubes toward cutoff, which lowers the current they draw, so we have two possibilities here, the AVC or one (or both) of the front end tubes. A third possibility is the meter itself, but not very likely. I don't know what the AVC should go down to (negative Voltage, y'know) but I woruld suspect that firsst, then the tubes.
:::::Lewis
:::::
::::
::::Thanks Lewis,
::::I have checked the tubes over and over and they are fine, life test ok. I measure about 1 and third negative volts. I do think it should be higher. I used new caps but now I'm thinking about lowering the value of caps involved in the AVC and see what happens. The schematic is hard to read and based on what I measured the old ones and a guess I could be off. I did look at the other similiar Stromberg schematics. I do know the set plays loud and clear. The meter reads about 850 ohms if I recall right.
::::Bill
::::
:::
:::
:::
:::I am not sure about that AVC Voltage, seems to me it should be lower (more negative) if you have a fairly strong station. Help, anyone?
:::Lewis
:::
::
:
6/18/2010 5:58:59 PMEdd . .try . .#2









Sir Bill. . . . . .from VA


That sets metering is dependent upon the current consumption of the 1st two RF tubes, the B+ supply level and the grid biasing being supplied to them via the developed AVC.


And I am blind on the scale length of the metering scale of the unit, so lets just hereafter be referring as a percentage of meter full scale deflection.


Now the B+ coming in to the low side of the metring seems to be a fixed factor and is coming in at quite a hefty level, in the respect of not having incorporating any high value series dropping resistor(s).


Not exactly sure on the magnetic field retentivity of old metering , with it not having been specifically designed for more critical intrumentation uses.


Now that meters in circuit tuning action range, we . . . CAN . . .evaluate.


To initially establish that , refer to my post of:


http://www.nostalgiaair.org/Forums/Messages/390/M0086390.htm


Which is a stand alone troubleshooting sequence relevant to tuning eye problems and you merely have an electro-mechanical variant here with the RF tubes plate current consumption being the indicator of metering.


Refer to the end schematic and the [Pale Yellow] inset of the building up of a test bias supply.


Build up that same circuitry and then lets locate the place that you need to connect.


Since I am now at a site that leaves me naked of my schematic / drawing facilities, let me have you find the
very noticable pair of .05 caps that are just lower left of the pilot lamp on the schema.


We are interrested in the junction of the bottom .05 and the 100K above it and the AVC buss wiring which
then flows over to the left to feed those RF tubes grid that I mentioned.


Now in the interim you have four potential problem childs in the respect of those two .05 caps leaking to ground and bleeeeeding down your hard earned AVC voltage . . . . along with two other dudes off to the left that are tied in to the two 100k resistors off from this buss that feed into the mixer stage where you see another .05 to ground being used there and over to the left at the RF stage it looks to be a .047 to ground being used there.

So four filtering caps are being involved.
Tolerate ZERO leakage from those components.


Now for the test . . . . connect the bias supply output resistor to the AVC buss at the very first junction that
I had initially mentioned .


Have the pot setting for putting out max negative voltage and observe the metering and give us that reading as its being proportional of a full scale reading.


Reverse the bias supply leads and introduce POSITIVE voltage to the AVC buss for just long enough time to establish a reading and give us the percentage of full scale.

Standing by . . . . . for test data to see direction of approach for further analysis.




73's de Edd






::Norm, the tubes tested on 533A. I can test them again. No 24A in place of 35. Tho I had thought about trying one. So thanks for the warning. The strongest station around here is 820 and it is very close. It does cause the most meter deflection but less than 1/8 inch movement. No problem with reading the resistor value as all old dogbone type were clearly marked.
::Bill
::


:::Hi
:::
::: Right, AVC goes negative when stronger stations are tuned in. Takes a good antenna, strong station and alignment to get the most meter movement.
:::
::: In this radio the meter moves by reduction of plate current in the RF and Mixer stages. Are proper, good tubes in these stages? Sometimes 24A and 35 are interchanged. Either may work for sound but not meter operation.
:::
::: The schematic shows resistors as .5 ohms etc. This is an error. Resistors marked like that should be shown as meg.
:::
:::http://www.nostalgiaair.org/PagesByModel/436/M0021436.pdf
:::
:::Norm


:::
:::::::I have the radio playing loud and clear, getting every watt out of the 45's. The pointer takes up position about 1/4 from left. It barely moves when tuning a station. How do I get more "swing to the right" from it? Otherwise more visual tho it does peak when right on.
:::::::Bill
:::::::
::::::
::::::
::::::

::::::
::::::On that receiver, the AVC controls the gain of the RF and converter sections by driving those tubes toward cutoff, which lowers the current they draw, so we have two possibilities here, the AVC or one (or both) of the front end tubes. A third possibility is the meter itself, but not very likely. I don't know what the AVC should go down to (negative Voltage, y'know) but I woruld suspect that firsst, then the tubes.
::::::Lewis
::::::
:::::


:::::Thanks Lewis,
:::::I have checked the tubes over and over and they are fine, life test ok. I measure about 1 and third negative volts. I do think it should be higher. I used new caps but now I'm thinking about lowering the value of caps involved in the AVC and see what happens. The schematic is hard to read and based on what I measured the old ones and a guess I could be off. I did look at the other similiar Stromberg schematics. I do know the set plays loud and clear. The meter reads about 850 ohms if I recall right.
:::::Bill
:::::
::::
::::



::::
::::I am not sure about that AVC Voltage, seems to me it should be lower (more negative) if you have a fairly strong station. Help, anyone?
::::Lewis
::::
:::
::
:

6/18/2010 10:23:05 PMBill VA
:
:
:
:

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:Sir Bill. . . . . .from VA
:
:
:That sets metering is dependent upon the current consumption of the 1st two RF tubes, the B+ supply level and the grid biasing being supplied to them via the developed AVC.
:
:
:And I am blind on the scale length of the metering scale of the unit, so lets just hereafter be referring as a percentage of meter full scale deflection.
:
:
:Now the B+ coming in to the low side of the metring seems to be a fixed factor and is coming in at quite a hefty level, in the respect of not having incorporating any high value series dropping resistor(s).
:
:
:Not exactly sure on the magnetic field retentivity of old metering , with it not having been specifically designed for more critical intrumentation uses.
:
:
:Now that meters in circuit tuning action range, we . . . CAN . . .evaluate.
:
:
:To initially establish that , refer to my post of:
:
:
:http://www.nostalgiaair.org/Forums/Messages/390/M0086390.htm
:
:
:Which is a stand alone troubleshooting sequence relevant to tuning eye problems and you merely have an electro-mechanical variant here with the RF tubes plate current consumption being the indicator of metering.
:
:
:Refer to the end schematic and the [Pale Yellow] inset of the building up of a test bias supply.
:
:
:Build up that same circuitry and then lets locate the place that you need to connect.
:
:
:Since I am now at a site that leaves me naked of my schematic / drawing facilities, let me have you find the
: very noticable pair of .05 caps that are just lower left of the pilot lamp on the schema.
:
:
:We are interrested in the junction of the bottom .05 and the 100K above it and the AVC buss wiring which
:then flows over to the left to feed those RF tubes grid that I mentioned.
:
:
:Now in the interim you have four potential problem childs in the respect of those two .05 caps leaking to ground and bleeeeeding down your hard earned AVC voltage . . . . along with two other dudes off to the left that are tied in to the two 100k resistors off from this buss that feed into the mixer stage where you see another .05 to ground being used there and over to the left at the RF stage it looks to be a .047 to ground being used there.
:
: So four filtering caps are being involved.
:Tolerate ZERO leakage from those components.
:
:
:Now for the test . . . . connect the bias supply output resistor to the AVC buss at the very first junction that
:I had initially mentioned .
:
:
:Have the pot setting for putting out max negative voltage and observe the metering and give us that reading as its being proportional of a full scale reading.
:
:
:Reverse the bias supply leads and introduce POSITIVE voltage to the AVC buss for just long enough time to establish a reading and give us the percentage of full scale.
:
:
:
:Standing by . . . . . for test data to see direction of approach for further analysis.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:73's de Edd

Thanks Edd,
Got a graduation but I plan on being back Monday evening. And looking for some cooler weather. It's just been too hot here. The caps are new but I'll check them.
Bill
:
:
:


:

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:::Norm, the tubes tested on 533A. I can test them again. No 24A in place of 35. Tho I had thought about trying one. So thanks for the warning. The strongest station around here is 820 and it is very close. It does cause the most meter deflection but less than 1/8 inch movement. No problem with reading the resistor value as all old dogbone type were clearly marked.
:::Bill
:::
:
:
:
:
::::Hi
::::
:::: Right, AVC goes negative when stronger stations are tuned in. Takes a good antenna, strong station and alignment to get the most meter movement.
::::
:::: In this radio the meter moves by reduction of plate current in the RF and Mixer stages. Are proper, good tubes in these stages? Sometimes 24A and 35 are interchanged. Either may work for sound but not meter operation.
::::
:::: The schematic shows resistors as .5 ohms etc. This is an error. Resistors marked like that should be shown as meg.
::::
::::http://www.nostalgiaair.org/PagesByModel/436/M0021436.pdf
::::
::::Norm
:
:
:
:
:
:
::::
::::::::I have the radio playing loud and clear, getting every watt out of the 45's. The pointer takes up position about 1/4 from left. It barely moves when tuning a station. How do I get more "swing to the right" from it? Otherwise more visual tho it does peak when right on.
::::::::Bill
::::::::
:::::::
:::::::
:::::::
:
:
:
:
:
:::::::
:::::::On that receiver, the AVC controls the gain of the RF and converter sections by driving those tubes toward cutoff, which lowers the current they draw, so we have two possibilities here, the AVC or one (or both) of the front end tubes. A third possibility is the meter itself, but not very likely. I don't know what the AVC should go down to (negative Voltage, y'know) but I woruld suspect that firsst, then the tubes.
:::::::Lewis
:::::::
::::::
:
:
:
:
::::::Thanks Lewis,
::::::I have checked the tubes over and over and they are fine, life test ok. I measure about 1 and third negative volts. I do think it should be higher. I used new caps but now I'm thinking about lowering the value of caps involved in the AVC and see what happens. The schematic is hard to read and based on what I measured the old ones and a guess I could be off. I did look at the other similiar Stromberg schematics. I do know the set plays loud and clear. The meter reads about 850 ohms if I recall right.
::::::Bill
::::::
:::::
:::::
:
:
:
:
:
:::::
:::::I am not sure about that AVC Voltage, seems to me it should be lower (more negative) if you have a fairly strong station. Help, anyone?
:::::Lewis
:::::
::::
:::
::
:
6/21/2010 1:46:27 PMBill VA
Hi Edd,
I'm back a little early so I worked up the meter deflections. I didn't mention it but the meter pointer in the off position is on the right side of meter. When set is turned on it assumes the position in the first picture. The second picture is with negative voltage, and the third is positive voltage. Thanks very much for your help.
Bill








:
:
:

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:Sir Bill. . . . . .from VA
:
:
:That sets metering is dependent upon the current consumption of the 1st two RF tubes, the B+ supply level and the grid biasing being supplied to them via the developed AVC.
:
:
:And I am blind on the scale length of the metering scale of the unit, so lets just hereafter be referring as a percentage of meter full scale deflection.
:
:
:Now the B+ coming in to the low side of the metring seems to be a fixed factor and is coming in at quite a hefty level, in the respect of not having incorporating any high value series dropping resistor(s).
:
:
:Not exactly sure on the magnetic field retentivity of old metering , with it not having been specifically designed for more critical intrumentation uses.
:
:
:Now that meters in circuit tuning action range, we . . . CAN . . .evaluate.
:
:
:To initially establish that , refer to my post of:
:
:
:http://www.nostalgiaair.org/Forums/Messages/390/M0086390.htm
:
:
:Which is a stand alone troubleshooting sequence relevant to tuning eye problems and you merely have an electro-mechanical variant here with the RF tubes plate current consumption being the indicator of metering.
:
:
:Refer to the end schematic and the [Pale Yellow] inset of the building up of a test bias supply.
:
:
:Build up that same circuitry and then lets locate the place that you need to connect.
:
:
:Since I am now at a site that leaves me naked of my schematic / drawing facilities, let me have you find the
: very noticable pair of .05 caps that are just lower left of the pilot lamp on the schema.
:
:
:We are interrested in the junction of the bottom .05 and the 100K above it and the AVC buss wiring which
:then flows over to the left to feed those RF tubes grid that I mentioned.
:
:
:Now in the interim you have four potential problem childs in the respect of those two .05 caps leaking to ground and bleeeeeding down your hard earned AVC voltage . . . . along with two other dudes off to the left that are tied in to the two 100k resistors off from this buss that feed into the mixer stage where you see another .05 to ground being used there and over to the left at the RF stage it looks to be a .047 to ground being used there.
:
: So four filtering caps are being involved.
:Tolerate ZERO leakage from those components.
:
:
:Now for the test . . . . connect the bias supply output resistor to the AVC buss at the very first junction that
:I had initially mentioned .
:
:
:Have the pot setting for putting out max negative voltage and observe the metering and give us that reading as its being proportional of a full scale reading.
:
:
:Reverse the bias supply leads and introduce POSITIVE voltage to the AVC buss for just long enough time to establish a reading and give us the percentage of full scale.
:
:
:
:Standing by . . . . . for test data to see direction of approach for further analysis.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:73's de Edd

:
:
:


:

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:::Norm, the tubes tested on 533A. I can test them again. No 24A in place of 35. Tho I had thought about trying one. So thanks for the warning. The strongest station around here is 820 and it is very close. It does cause the most meter deflection but less than 1/8 inch movement. No problem with reading the resistor value as all old dogbone type were clearly marked.
:::Bill
:::
:
:
:
:
::::Hi
::::
:::: Right, AVC goes negative when stronger stations are tuned in. Takes a good antenna, strong station and alignment to get the most meter movement.
::::
:::: In this radio the meter moves by reduction of plate current in the RF and Mixer stages. Are proper, good tubes in these stages? Sometimes 24A and 35 are interchanged. Either may work for sound but not meter operation.
::::
:::: The schematic shows resistors as .5 ohms etc. This is an error. Resistors marked like that should be shown as meg.
::::
::::http://www.nostalgiaair.org/PagesByModel/436/M0021436.pdf
::::
::::Norm
:
:
:
:
:
:
::::
::::::::I have the radio playing loud and clear, getting every watt out of the 45's. The pointer takes up position about 1/4 from left. It barely moves when tuning a station. How do I get more "swing to the right" from it? Otherwise more visual tho it does peak when right on.
::::::::Bill
::::::::
:::::::
:::::::
:::::::
:
:
:
:
:
:::::::
:::::::On that receiver, the AVC controls the gain of the RF and converter sections by driving those tubes toward cutoff, which lowers the current they draw, so we have two possibilities here, the AVC or one (or both) of the front end tubes. A third possibility is the meter itself, but not very likely. I don't know what the AVC should go down to (negative Voltage, y'know) but I woruld suspect that firsst, then the tubes.
:::::::Lewis
:::::::
::::::
:
:
:
:
::::::Thanks Lewis,
::::::I have checked the tubes over and over and they are fine, life test ok. I measure about 1 and third negative volts. I do think it should be higher. I used new caps but now I'm thinking about lowering the value of caps involved in the AVC and see what happens. The schematic is hard to read and based on what I measured the old ones and a guess I could be off. I did look at the other similiar Stromberg schematics. I do know the set plays loud and clear. The meter reads about 850 ohms if I recall right.
::::::Bill
::::::
:::::
:::::
:
:
:
:
:
:::::
:::::I am not sure about that AVC Voltage, seems to me it should be lower (more negative) if you have a fairly strong station. Help, anyone?
:::::Lewis
:::::
::::
:::
::
:

6/22/2010 12:47:06 PMEdd








Sir . . . . . .Bill . . . . where ? . . .WVA ! . .no less.

Wierdly enough . . . . but the last graduation I attended was at high noon on a Saturday.


Those fotie-grafs, provided, far exceeded my info feedback being expected !


Reviewing:


Seeing the tuning meters point of circuitry insertion, is dependent upon its action actually being a current reading of the first two RF oriented tubes plate currents consumption. Therefore that would be entailing a constant fixed UPSCALE reading of the metering . . . . . probably ending up being about 3/4 upscale or thereabouts.

BUT if you merely physically invert the meter 180 degrees, such as they have done, that will result in a normal positioning of that pointer as now being PERCIEVED as being located in the LOWER quadrant of the now reversed / transitioned meter scale.


That being a good static pointer positioning in the respect of that if one is tuned in between stations, it would still have the metering showing just a bit of "psuedo reception activity" by its pointer being up scale just a bit from the left scales start of zero indexing.


Agreed now . . .that your first photo seems logical in having its pointer initially being at the right extreme with NO AC POWER applied to the set, since an inactive meter rests at its "0" setting.


Then as the sets tubes warm up after turn on, the pointer gradually shifts to the LEFT to that mentioned quiescent plate current indication which we just described. That then APPEARS to be a reduced reading since it is over to the left of the scale BUT that is merely by virtue of the meter having been mounted UPSIDE DOWN.


Now here is where you have the next two photos with their pointer action demonstrating the meter pointer response to the opposite test bias polarities of + and - 9V which you alternatively applied to the AVC buss.


Observation 1:


You said that you initially applied the - 9VDC polarity test bias to the AVC buss and that should have diminished the 2 frontal tubes plate current consumption and caused the meter pointer to shift to the "right", (Its REALLY pulling less currrent)which would agree with its on scale info of tuning for the meter to respond progressively more to the right as you are tuning more perfectly onto a station.


Now we will have to confirm for sure a bit later, but a developed -9V of AVC would be pretty decent level for this old warhorse of a receiver and its design and one might expect that to be almost the max to the right that pointer is going to be reaching unless the set proves to be able to develop a bit more AVC voltage than that - 9VDC level with its stages alignment being peaked up a bit more.


At any rate I might think that you never saw that high of an upscale meter reading in your prior tests with the sets developed AVC biasing providing the indication.


Observation 2:


You then applied the + 9VDC polarity test bias to the AVC buss and that should have INCREASED the current consumption of the two RF tubes to the max deflection reading that would ever be developed across that meter. To be exact, we probably just don't know exactly what that max value is, by merely observing that meter pointer as it is being pegged against the mechanical end travel limiter, located down within the meter coil movement.


Now with that meter being upside down . . . we are effectively being transported to the combined Wizard of Ox and Alice in Wonderland juxtoposition of metering . . . with an upscale reading really being down scale, along with a more current display really being a less of a current display.


Specifically . . . when I compare the actions of the two photos that are depicting the positive and negative biasing tests, they certainly seem to be REVERSE of their expected actions.


Did you possibly err and assign the incorrect 2nd and 3rd photo identification to the polarity of biasing test being performed . . .?


With only photo 1 being in perfect agreement. . . . no problem there with it.


Additionally, in waiting for that clarification and this schematic being a dreadfull bedfull with its transitioning between three different time frames of resistor identification.


Need this info, looking at the DET/AVC tubes plate it flows down to the point where there is one end leg of a voltage divider bridge with the presence of a 500K resistor to common ground rail.


The plate line is also branching on down to the first 500k and then ties into another 100K resistor and then the line flows to the far left to then be feeding the RF amp thru a 100k and also the mixer is being fed thru a 100k.


Is your set wired like this, with those values, and are their tolerances within spec ?


Next will be the power supply in its voltage divider string where they are taking a wee bit of B+ from just above the 340 ohm value and routing it up to an initial 100k and then can you clarify the next resistors value up above it and if it seems to be the original and in spec.


(Past that last questioned resistor value, it then flows upward to tie into the 1st grid of the Demod /AVC tube.)

Now, not being able to confirm by the schematic designators nor the parts list in their showing any ganging of capacitors. Are there any more than two sections to your main tuning condenser ?


Also, am I only seeing one tuning adjustment provision for the whole IF section ?


That tuning meter reminds me of an economy Emico unit . . .typically with no left zero pointer positioning capabilities like the Simpsons-Tripletts and Westons do.


Odd . . . on one of your photos a reflection seems to "ghost in" a like zero setting screw, but being a bit off center and placed much lower than that adjustment would typically would be found .


Lastly, just in case those last 2 photos, of applied biasing polarity /versus/metering response happen to be as you initially said, how's about firing up the set in normal operation mode and monitor the plate voltage of the demod / AVC tube and have the set tuned right on that 820 khz? strong local station, and then tune just to the side for a dead spot and give the plate voltage reading for that dial position. Submit both voltages experienced.


As for the tuning meter, does there seem to be any added resistor tacked across the meter terminals, thereby giving the factory the custom flexibility of compressing----expanding the scale ranges action ?


That's all for now . . . .





73's de Edd








:Hi Edd,
:I'm back a little early so I worked up the meter deflections. I didn't mention it but the meter pointer in the off position is on the right side of meter. When set is turned on it assumes the position in the first picture. The second picture is with negative voltage, and the third is positive voltage. Thanks very much for your help.
:Bill
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
::
::
::

::
::
::
::
::
::
::
::
::
::
::Sir Bill. . . . . .from VA
::
::
::That sets metering is dependent upon the current consumption of the 1st two RF tubes, the B+ supply level and the grid biasing being supplied to them via the developed AVC.
::
::
::And I am blind on the scale length of the metering scale of the unit, so lets just hereafter be referring as a percentage of meter full scale deflection.
::
::
::Now the B+ coming in to the low side of the metring seems to be a fixed factor and is coming in at quite a hefty level, in the respect of not having incorporating any high value series dropping resistor(s).
::
::
::Not exactly sure on the magnetic field retentivity of old metering , with it not having been specifically designed for more critical intrumentation uses.
::
::
::Now that meters in circuit tuning action range, we . . . CAN . . .evaluate.
::
::
::To initially establish that , refer to my post of:
::
::
::http://www.nostalgiaair.org/Forums/Messages/390/M0086390.htm
::
::
::Which is a stand alone troubleshooting sequence relevant to tuning eye problems and you merely have an electro-mechanical variant here with the RF tubes plate current consumption being the indicator of metering.
::
::
::Refer to the end schematic and the [Pale Yellow] inset of the building up of a test bias supply.
::
::
::Build up that same circuitry and then lets locate the place that you need to connect.
::
::
::Since I am now at a site that leaves me naked of my schematic / drawing facilities, let me have you find the
:: very noticable pair of .05 caps that are just lower left of the pilot lamp on the schema.
::
::
::We are interrested in the junction of the bottom .05 and the 100K above it and the AVC buss wiring which
::then flows over to the left to feed those RF tubes grid that I mentioned.
::
::
::Now in the interim you have four potential problem childs in the respect of those two .05 caps leaking to ground and bleeeeeding down your hard earned AVC voltage . . . . along with two other dudes off to the left that are tied in to the two 100k resistors off from this buss that feed into the mixer stage where you see another .05 to ground being used there and over to the left at the RF stage it looks to be a .047 to ground being used there.
::
:: So four filtering caps are being involved.
::Tolerate ZERO leakage from those components.
::
::
::Now for the test . . . . connect the bias supply output resistor to the AVC buss at the very first junction that
::I had initially mentioned .
::
::
::Have the pot setting for putting out max negative voltage and observe the metering and give us that reading as its being proportional of a full scale reading.
::
::
::Reverse the bias supply leads and introduce POSITIVE voltage to the AVC buss for just long enough time to establish a reading and give us the percentage of full scale.
::
::
::
::Standing by . . . . . for test data to see direction of approach for further analysis.
::
::
::
::
::
::
::73's de Edd

::
::
::


::

::
::
::
::
::
::
::
::
::
::::Norm, the tubes tested on 533A. I can test them again. No 24A in place of 35. Tho I had thought about trying one. So thanks for the warning. The strongest station around here is 820 and it is very close. It does cause the most meter deflection but less than 1/8 inch movement. No problem with reading the resistor value as all old dogbone type were clearly marked.
::::Bill
::::
::
::
::
::
:::::Hi
:::::
::::: Right, AVC goes negative when stronger stations are tuned in. Takes a good antenna, strong station and alignment to get the most meter movement.
:::::
::::: In this radio the meter moves by reduction of plate current in the RF and Mixer stages. Are proper, good tubes in these stages? Sometimes 24A and 35 are interchanged. Either may work for sound but not meter operation.
:::::
::::: The schematic shows resistors as .5 ohms etc. This is an error. Resistors marked like that should be shown as meg.
:::::
:::::http://www.nostalgiaair.org/PagesByModel/436/M0021436.pdf
:::::
:::::Norm
::
::
::
::
::
::
:::::
:::::::::I have the radio playing loud and clear, getting every watt out of the 45's. The pointer takes up position about 1/4 from left. It barely moves when tuning a station. How do I get more "swing to the right" from it? Otherwise more visual tho it does peak when right on.
:::::::::Bill
:::::::::
::::::::
::::::::
::::::::
::
::
::
::
::
::::::::
::::::::On that receiver, the AVC controls the gain of the RF and converter sections by driving those tubes toward cutoff, which lowers the current they draw, so we have two possibilities here, the AVC or one (or both) of the front end tubes. A third possibility is the meter itself, but not very likely. I don't know what the AVC should go down to (negative Voltage, y'know) but I woruld suspect that firsst, then the tubes.
::::::::Lewis
::::::::
:::::::
::
::
::
::
:::::::Thanks Lewis,
:::::::I have checked the tubes over and over and they are fine, life test ok. I measure about 1 and third negative volts. I do think it should be higher. I used new caps but now I'm thinking about lowering the value of caps involved in the AVC and see what happens. The schematic is hard to read and based on what I measured the old ones and a guess I could be off. I did look at the other similiar Stromberg schematics. I do know the set plays loud and clear. The meter reads about 850 ohms if I recall right.
:::::::Bill
:::::::
::::::
::::::
::
::
::
::
::
::::::
::::::I am not sure about that AVC Voltage, seems to me it should be lower (more negative) if you have a fairly strong station. Help, anyone?
::::::Lewis
::::::
:::::
::::
:::
::
:

6/23/2010 10:57:49 PMBill VA
:
:

:
:
:
:
:

Well Edd, leave it to me to cross the wires. Should read:

The second picture is with positive voltage, and the third is negative voltage.

All the resistors from the DET/AVC tube's plate are new and in tolerance and wired as the schematic indicates.

The wee bit of B+ (12.72)from just above 340 ohm (lug 3) goes to the 100K and then to a 250K. The old 250k measured 555K and was replaced with new one measuring 254K. The 250K goes to the DET grid.

All of the old resistors were replaced. I just think it's too much of a gamble even if in 10% tolerance.

The tuning cap is four gang. And I see only one tuning adjustment for the IF's. But isn't the tri-resonator just "tuned" to pass on?

The meter does not have a resistor across the terminals and I'm going to look at that zero screw again. I believe it's a fake.

With the set right on 820 the plate voltage measured a negative 3.566 and tuned off it was negative .696 volts.

Oh, and it's Virginia. Not from VA but I've been here going on 31 years.

Bill


:
:
:
:
:
:Sir . . . . . .Bill . . . . where ? . . .WVA ! . .no less.
:
:
:
:Wierdly enough . . . . but the last graduation I attended was at high noon on a Saturday.
:
:
:Those fotie-grafs, provided, far exceeded my info feedback being expected !
:
:
:Reviewing:
:
:
:Seeing the tuning meters point of circuitry insertion, is dependent upon its action actually being a current reading of the first two RF oriented tubes plate currents consumption. Therefore that would be entailing a constant fixed UPSCALE reading of the metering . . . . . probably ending up being about 3/4 upscale or thereabouts.
:
:BUT if you merely physically invert the meter 180 degrees, such as they have done, that will result in a normal positioning of that pointer as now being PERCIEVED as being located in the LOWER quadrant of the now reversed / transitioned meter scale.
:
:
:That being a good static pointer positioning in the respect of that if one is tuned in between stations, it would still have the metering showing just a bit of "psuedo reception activity" by its pointer being up scale just a bit from the left scales start of zero indexing.
:
:
:Agreed now . . .that your first photo seems logical in having its pointer initially being at the right extreme with NO AC POWER applied to the set, since an inactive meter rests at its "0" setting.
:
:
:Then as the sets tubes warm up after turn on, the pointer gradually shifts to the LEFT to that mentioned quiescent plate current indication which we just described. That then APPEARS to be a reduced reading since it is over to the left of the scale BUT that is merely by virtue of the meter having been mounted UPSIDE DOWN.
:
:
:Now here is where you have the next two photos with their pointer action demonstrating the meter pointer response to the opposite test bias polarities of + and - 9V which you alternatively applied to the AVC buss.
:
:
:Observation 1:
:
:
:You said that you initially applied the - 9VDC polarity test bias to the AVC buss and that should have diminished the 2 frontal tubes plate current consumption and caused the meter pointer to shift to the "right", (Its REALLY pulling less currrent)which would agree with its on scale info of tuning for the meter to respond progressively more to the right as you are tuning more perfectly onto a station.
:
:
:Now we will have to confirm for sure a bit later, but a developed -9V of AVC would be pretty decent level for this old warhorse of a receiver and its design and one might expect that to be almost the max to the right that pointer is going to be reaching unless the set proves to be able to develop a bit more AVC voltage than that - 9VDC level with its stages alignment being peaked up a bit more.
:
:
:At any rate I might think that you never saw that high of an upscale meter reading in your prior tests with the sets developed AVC biasing providing the indication.
:
:
:Observation 2:
:
:
:You then applied the + 9VDC polarity test bias to the AVC buss and that should have INCREASED the current consumption of the two RF tubes to the max deflection reading that would ever be developed across that meter. To be exact, we probably just don't know exactly what that max value is, by merely observing that meter pointer as it is being pegged against the mechanical end travel limiter, located down within the meter coil movement.
:
:
:Now with that meter being upside down . . . we are effectively being transported to the combined Wizard of Ox and Alice in Wonderland juxtoposition of metering . . . with an upscale reading really being down scale, along with a more current display really being a less of a current display.
:
:
:Specifically . . . when I compare the actions of the two photos that are depicting the positive and negative biasing tests, they certainly seem to be REVERSE of their expected actions.
:
:
:Did you possibly err and assign the incorrect 2nd and 3rd photo identification to the polarity of biasing test being performed . . .?
:
:
:With only photo 1 being in perfect agreement. . . . no problem there with it.
:
:
:Additionally, in waiting for that clarification and this schematic being a dreadfull bedfull with its transitioning between three different time frames of resistor identification.
:
:
:Need this info, looking at the DET/AVC tubes plate it flows down to the point where there is one end leg of a voltage divider bridge with the presence of a 500K resistor to common ground rail.
:
:
:The plate line is also branching on down to the first 500k and then ties into another 100K resistor and then the line flows to the far left to then be feeding the RF amp thru a 100k and also the mixer is being fed thru a 100k.
:
:
:Is your set wired like this, with those values, and are their tolerances within spec ?
:
:
:Next will be the power supply in its voltage divider string where they are taking a wee bit of B+ from just above the 340 ohm value and routing it up to an initial 100k and then can you clarify the next resistors value up above it and if it seems to be the original and in spec.
:
:
:(Past that last questioned resistor value, it then flows upward to tie into the 1st grid of the Demod /AVC tube.)
:
:
:
:Now, not being able to confirm by the schematic designators nor the parts list in their showing any ganging of capacitors. Are there any more than two sections to your main tuning condenser ?
:
:
:Also, am I only seeing one tuning adjustment provision for the whole IF section ?
:
:
:That tuning meter reminds me of an economy Emico unit . . .typically with no left zero pointer positioning capabilities like the Simpsons-Tripletts and Westons do.
:
:
:Odd . . . on one of your photos a reflection seems to "ghost in" a like zero setting screw, but being a bit off center and placed much lower than that adjustment would typically would be found .
:
:
:Lastly, just in case those last 2 photos, of applied biasing polarity /versus/metering response happen to be as you initially said, how's about firing up the set in normal operation mode and monitor the plate voltage of the demod / AVC tube and have the set tuned right on that 820 khz? strong local station, and then tune just to the side for a dead spot and give the plate voltage reading for that dial position. Submit both voltages experienced.
:
:
:As for the tuning meter, does there seem to be any added resistor tacked across the meter terminals, thereby giving the factory the custom flexibility of compressing----expanding the scale ranges action ?
:
:
:That's all for now . . . .
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:73's de Edd

:
:
:


:

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
::Hi Edd,
::I'm back a little early so I worked up the meter deflections. I didn't mention it but the meter pointer in the off position is on the right side of meter. When set is turned on it assumes the position in the first picture. The second picture is with negative voltage, and the third is positive voltage. Thanks very much for your help.
::Bill
::
::
::
::
::
::
::
::
:::
:::
:::

:::
:::
:::
:::
:::
:::
:::
:::
:::
:::
:::Sir Bill. . . . . .from VA
:::
:::
:::That sets metering is dependent upon the current consumption of the 1st two RF tubes, the B+ supply level and the grid biasing being supplied to them via the developed AVC.
:::
:::
:::And I am blind on the scale length of the metering scale of the unit, so lets just hereafter be referring as a percentage of meter full scale deflection.
:::
:::
:::Now the B+ coming in to the low side of the metring seems to be a fixed factor and is coming in at quite a hefty level, in the respect of not having incorporating any high value series dropping resistor(s).
:::
:::
:::Not exactly sure on the magnetic field retentivity of old metering , with it not having been specifically designed for more critical intrumentation uses.
:::
:::
:::Now that meters in circuit tuning action range, we . . . CAN . . .evaluate.
:::
:::
:::To initially establish that , refer to my post of:
:::
:::
:::http://www.nostalgiaair.org/Forums/Messages/390/M0086390.htm
:::
:::
:::Which is a stand alone troubleshooting sequence relevant to tuning eye problems and you merely have an electro-mechanical variant here with the RF tubes plate current consumption being the indicator of metering.
:::
:::
:::Refer to the end schematic and the [Pale Yellow] inset of the building up of a test bias supply.
:::
:::
:::Build up that same circuitry and then lets locate the place that you need to connect.
:::
:::
:::Since I am now at a site that leaves me naked of my schematic / drawing facilities, let me have you find the
::: very noticable pair of .05 caps that are just lower left of the pilot lamp on the schema.
:::
:::
:::We are interrested in the junction of the bottom .05 and the 100K above it and the AVC buss wiring which
:::then flows over to the left to feed those RF tubes grid that I mentioned.
:::
:::
:::Now in the interim you have four potential problem childs in the respect of those two .05 caps leaking to ground and bleeeeeding down your hard earned AVC voltage . . . . along with two other dudes off to the left that are tied in to the two 100k resistors off from this buss that feed into the mixer stage where you see another .05 to ground being used there and over to the left at the RF stage it looks to be a .047 to ground being used there.
:::
::: So four filtering caps are being involved.
:::Tolerate ZERO leakage from those components.
:::
:::
:::Now for the test . . . . connect the bias supply output resistor to the AVC buss at the very first junction that
:::I had initially mentioned .
:::
:::
:::Have the pot setting for putting out max negative voltage and observe the metering and give us that reading as its being proportional of a full scale reading.
:::
:::
:::Reverse the bias supply leads and introduce POSITIVE voltage to the AVC buss for just long enough time to establish a reading and give us the percentage of full scale.
:::
:::
:::
:::Standing by . . . . . for test data to see direction of approach for further analysis.
:::
:::
:::
:::
:::
:::
:::73's de Edd

:::
:::
:::


:::

:::
:::
:::
:::
:::
:::
:::
:::
:::
:::::Norm, the tubes tested on 533A. I can test them again. No 24A in place of 35. Tho I had thought about trying one. So thanks for the warning. The strongest station around here is 820 and it is very close. It does cause the most meter deflection but less than 1/8 inch movement. No problem with reading the resistor value as all old dogbone type were clearly marked.
:::::Bill
:::::
:::
:::
:::
:::
::::::Hi
::::::
:::::: Right, AVC goes negative when stronger stations are tuned in. Takes a good antenna, strong station and alignment to get the most meter movement.
::::::
:::::: In this radio the meter moves by reduction of plate current in the RF and Mixer stages. Are proper, good tubes in these stages? Sometimes 24A and 35 are interchanged. Either may work for sound but not meter operation.
::::::
:::::: The schematic shows resistors as .5 ohms etc. This is an error. Resistors marked like that should be shown as meg.
::::::
::::::http://www.nostalgiaair.org/PagesByModel/436/M0021436.pdf
::::::
::::::Norm
:::
:::
:::
:::
:::
:::
::::::
::::::::::I have the radio playing loud and clear, getting every watt out of the 45's. The pointer takes up position about 1/4 from left. It barely moves when tuning a station. How do I get more "swing to the right" from it? Otherwise more visual tho it does peak when right on.
::::::::::Bill
::::::::::
:::::::::
:::::::::
:::::::::
:::
:::
:::
:::
:::
:::::::::
:::::::::On that receiver, the AVC controls the gain of the RF and converter sections by driving those tubes toward cutoff, which lowers the current they draw, so we have two possibilities here, the AVC or one (or both) of the front end tubes. A third possibility is the meter itself, but not very likely. I don't know what the AVC should go down to (negative Voltage, y'know) but I woruld suspect that firsst, then the tubes.
:::::::::Lewis
:::::::::
::::::::
:::
:::
:::
:::
::::::::Thanks Lewis,
::::::::I have checked the tubes over and over and they are fine, life test ok. I measure about 1 and third negative volts. I do think it should be higher. I used new caps but now I'm thinking about lowering the value of caps involved in the AVC and see what happens. The schematic is hard to read and based on what I measured the old ones and a guess I could be off. I did look at the other similiar Stromberg schematics. I do know the set plays loud and clear. The meter reads about 850 ohms if I recall right.
::::::::Bill
::::::::
:::::::
:::::::
:::
:::
:::
:::
:::
:::::::
:::::::I am not sure about that AVC Voltage, seems to me it should be lower (more negative) if you have a fairly strong station. Help, anyone?
:::::::Lewis
:::::::
::::::
:::::
::::
:::
::
:
6/22/2010 5:00:12 PMWarren
Here is an interesting link about tuning meters. It does give some details.

http://www.radiomuseum.org/forum/history_of_tuning_indicators_meters_graphs_magic_eye_led.html

6/18/2010 10:14:24 PMBill VA
::::I have the radio playing loud and clear, getting every watt out of the 45's. The pointer takes up position about 1/4 from left. It barely moves when tuning a station. How do I get more "swing to the right" from it? Otherwise more visual tho it does peak when right on.
::::Bill
::::
:::
:::
:::
:::
:::On that receiver, the AVC controls the gain of the RF and converter sections by driving those tubes toward cutoff, which lowers the current they draw, so we have two possibilities here, the AVC or one (or both) of the front end tubes. A third possibility is the meter itself, but not very likely. I don't know what the AVC should go down to (negative Voltage, y'know) but I woruld suspect that firsst, then the tubes.
:::Lewis
:::
::
::Thanks Lewis,
::I have checked the tubes over and over and they are fine, life test ok. I measure about 1 and third negative volts. I do think it should be higher. I used new caps but now I'm thinking about lowering the value of caps involved in the AVC and see what happens. The schematic is hard to read and based on what I measured the old ones and a guess I could be off. I did look at the other similiar Stromberg schematics. I do know the set plays loud and clear. The meter reads about 850 ohms if I recall right.
::Bill
::
:
:
:
:I am not sure about that AVC Voltage, seems to me it should be lower (more negative) if you have a fairly strong station. Help, anyone?
:Lewis
:
Bill

6/26/2010 10:37:14 PMEdd








Sir Bill . . . . . .


Initially . . . I'm adding on a Stromberger Carlsonator marked up Schema at the end that is assigned RF and IF tuned circuit identifiers in case we need to differentiate in their functions/ assignments in the future.


The tuning cap is four gang.



Right, and am I correctly seeing them as:


The assigned [Pink] #2 for the antennna input stage


The assigned [Pink] #3 for the RF amp input stage


The assigned [Pink] #4 for the Mixer input stage


The assigned [Blue] #4 for the antennna input stage


(Two assigned #4 sections but I will just further differentiate


with the [Blue] being for the oscillator and not redraw.)



And I see only one tuning adjustment for the IF's.


But isn't the tri-resonator just "tuned" to pass on?



Yep . .that would be the tuned circuit between its pri and secondary coils.


NOW . . . which of those potential GREEN A-B-C-D adjustment trimmers is your found "one"


adjustment, and could the others be hidden away a bit, internally of a can ?



The meter does not have a resistor across the terminals and I'm going to look at that zero screw again. I believe it's a fake.



1 . . .


Just wanted to be sure that no meter shunting was involved for "fine tuning" meter scaling.


2 . . .


That's certainly the way that I was seeing it . . . as possibly being a reflected image of some mechanics of your camera coming off the meters glass . . . its lighting angle possibly having been just right for its creation on that one photo, as it was not even seen on the other shot angles of the two other photos.



With the set right on 820 the plate voltage measured a negative 3.566 and tuned off it was negative .696 volts.



Soooooo that 820 stations optimal . . . to date . . .- 3.566 developed AVC voltage is falling quite shy of that -9V that you were testing with.


Assuming now that you had all RF---IF adjustments optimally peaked on that 820 station and that you have no
increased resistance on your tuned circuit coils ?


I'll clarify that for you . . . et al:


Should your coils have been wound with Litz wire . . . with time onset, either a combo of:


1 . . . Poor Litz to connector interface soldering.(Factory)


2 . . .Excess time and heat that the rosin / wire junction might have been subjected to.(Factory)


3 . . .Cross contamination of the irons tip with having been used with acid core on a previous chassis mechanical
. . . . .soldering operation.(Factory)


4 . . ."Alligatoring" "checkering" of the wires old generation enamel coating . . . exposing bare copper for erosion.(AGING)


5 . . .Our current days typically higher level of airborne (humidity retained) alkaline and acidic contaminants to react with that . . . . .once exposed copper and slowly erode away at it.


Now the end result is that 10/44 Litz . . . . that's ten strands of spiraled and interwound 44 gauge wire . .and that it is now found only retaining 3 ? intact strands . . . is in no way going to exhibit the tuned "Q" and performance of that coils original resonant winding.


My fix . . . when finding this . . . is to razor blade flush cut at the connector to get as much of that finite wire length in order to then magnify/examine that bad end and re tin ALL of its leads and then fabricate an "eye of a needle" with AC zip cord's bare copper wire, supplying but a single strand, and then tin it and then flow solder it onto the coil / lug connector/ terminal.


Then the tinned Litz end is inserted into the central open "eye of the needle" and rapid re-flow soldered.



Now if the AVC can not be raised further by any optimizing of the sets alignmant / tuning, seems like your desired meters increasing of tuning spread would be dependent upon shifting the biasing parameters around the detector / AVC circuitry.


To wit:


The detector circuitry is working with the 1st grid and the cathode of the Demod/AVC tube and their feed into the 250K and 100K divider resistors that are then routed down to their counterpoise biasing source being acquired down at the 340 ohm / 3080 ohm junction down within the power supply.


It will take some shifting of those resistors interelational ratios to accomplish scale tailoring to your end need.

Standing by for your initial / potential further optimizatoin of tuning.



73's de Edd











Stromberger Carlsonator 29 . . . working . . . SCHEMATIC:









I have the radio playing loud and clear, getting every watt out of the 45's. The pointer takes up position about 1/4 from left. It barely moves when tuning a station. How do I get more "swing to the right" from it? Otherwise more visual tho it does peak when right on.
On that receiver, the AVC controls the gain of the RF and converter sections by driving those tubes toward cutoff, which lowers the current they draw, so we have two possibilities here, the AVC or one (or both) of the front end tubes. A third possibility is the meter itself, but not very likely. I don't know what the AVC should go down to (negative Voltage, y'know) but I woruld suspect that firsst, then the tubes.
Lewis

I have checked the tubes over and over and they are fine, life test ok. I measure about 1 and third negative volts. I do think it should be higher. I used new caps but now I'm thinking about lowering the value of caps involved in the AVC and see what happens. The schematic is hard to read and based on what I measured the old ones and a guess I could be off. I did look at the other similiar Stromberg schematics. I do know the set plays loud and clear. The meter reads about 850 ohms if I recall right.
Lewis

IPAddress: ***.145.88.203

Correct Lewis, more negative.
Bill


6/29/2010 7:15:47 PMBill VA
:
:

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:Sir Bill . . . . . .
:
:
:
:
:Initially . . . I'm adding on a Stromberger Carlsonator marked up Schema at the end that is assigned RF and IF tuned circuit identifiers in case we need to differentiate in their functions/ assignments in the future.
:
:
:
:
:The tuning cap is four gang.
:
:
:
:Right, and am I correctly seeing them as:
:
:
:The assigned [Pink] #2 for the antennna input stage
:
:
:The assigned [Pink] #3 for the RF amp input stage
:
:
:The assigned [Pink] #4 for the Mixer input stage
:
:
:The assigned [Blue] #4 for the antennna input stage
:
:
:(Two assigned #4 sections but I will just further differentiate
:
:
:with the [Blue] being for the oscillator and not redraw.)
:
:
:
:And I see only one tuning adjustment for the IF's.
:
:
:But isn't the tri-resonator just "tuned" to pass on?
:
:
:
:Yep . .that would be the tuned circuit between its pri and secondary coils.
:
:
:NOW . . . which of those potential GREEN A-B-C-D adjustment trimmers is your found "one"
:
:
:adjustment, and could the others be hidden away a bit, internally of a can ?
:
:
:
:The meter does not have a resistor across the terminals and I'm going to look at that zero screw again. I believe it's a fake.
:
:
:
:1 . . .
:
:
:Just wanted to be sure that no meter shunting was involved for "fine tuning" meter scaling.
:
:
:2 . . .
:
:
:That's certainly the way that I was seeing it . . . as possibly being a reflected image of some mechanics of your camera coming off the meters glass . . . its lighting angle possibly having been just right for its creation on that one photo, as it was not even seen on the other shot angles of the two other photos.
:
:
:
:With the set right on 820 the plate voltage measured a negative 3.566 and tuned off it was negative .696 volts.
:
:
:
:Soooooo that 820 stations optimal . . . to date . . .- 3.566 developed AVC voltage is falling quite shy of that -9V that you were testing with.
:
:
:Assuming now that you had all RF---IF adjustments optimally peaked on that 820 station and that you have no
:increased resistance on your tuned circuit coils ?
:
:
:I'll clarify that for you . . . et al:
:
:
:Should your coils have been wound with Litz wire . . . with time onset, either a combo of:
:
:
:1 . . . Poor Litz to connector interface soldering.(Factory)
:
:
:2 . . .Excess time and heat that the rosin / wire junction might have been subjected to.(Factory)
:
:
:3 . . .Cross contamination of the irons tip with having been used with acid core on a previous chassis mechanical
:. . . . .soldering operation.(Factory)
:
:
:4 . . ."Alligatoring" "checkering" of the wires old generation enamel coating . . . exposing bare copper for erosion.(AGING)
:
:
:5 . . .Our current days typically higher level of airborne (humidity retained) alkaline and acidic contaminants to react with that . . . . .once exposed copper and slowly erode away at it.
:
:
:Now the end result is that 10/44 Litz . . . . that's ten strands of spiraled and interwound 44 gauge wire . .and that it is now found only retaining 3 ? intact strands . . . is in no way going to exhibit the tuned "Q" and performance of that coils original resonant winding.
:
:
:My fix . . . when finding this . . . is to razor blade flush cut at the connector to get as much of that finite wire length in order to then magnify/examine that bad end and re tin ALL of its leads and then fabricate an "eye of a needle" with AC zip cord's bare copper wire, supplying but a single strand, and then tin it and then flow solder it onto the coil / lug connector/ terminal.
:
:
:Then the tinned Litz end is inserted into the central open "eye of the needle" and rapid re-flow soldered.
:
:
:
:
:
:Now if the AVC can not be raised further by any optimizing of the sets alignmant / tuning, seems like your desired meters increasing of tuning spread would be dependent upon shifting the biasing parameters around the detector / AVC circuitry.
:
:
:To wit:
:
:
:The detector circuitry is working with the 1st grid and the cathode of the Demod/AVC tube and their feed into the 250K and 100K divider resistors that are then routed down to their counterpoise biasing source being acquired down at the 340 ohm / 3080 ohm junction down within the power supply.
:
:
:It will take some shifting of those resistors interelational ratios to accomplish scale tailoring to your end need.
:
:
:
:Standing by for your initial / potential further optimizatoin of tuning.
:
:
:
:
:
:73's de Edd

Sir Edd,
I'm about to go away on a few weeks vacation. Will get back on this when I return. However, I did check the meter out because of the screw head and also the sometimes erratic movement of the pointer. This might be to my detriment. The screw only holds the face of the meter to the meter workings. Once loose things fell apart fast. Leads broke and a piece of insulating paper glued to the coil came off. At the glue point on the coil there was corrosion and now I have three ends not counting the one very short lead wire from wrong end of the winding. I set it aside until I get a new magnifier lamp. I'm going to go ahead with what you outlined when I get back. Will have to see what happens with the meter problem.
Bill
:
:
:


:

:
:
:
:
:

:
:
:
:Stromberger Carlsonator 29 . . . working . . . SCHEMATIC:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

:
:
:
:
:
:I have the radio playing loud and clear, getting every watt out of the 45's. The pointer takes up position about 1/4 from left. It barely moves when tuning a station. How do I get more "swing to the right" from it? Otherwise more visual tho it does peak when right on.
:Bill
:
:
:
:
:
:On that receiver, the AVC controls the gain of the RF and converter sections by driving those tubes toward cutoff, which lowers the current they draw, so we have two possibilities here, the AVC or one (or both) of the front end tubes. A third possibility is the meter itself, but not very likely. I don't know what the AVC should go down to (negative Voltage, y'know) but I woruld suspect that firsst, then the tubes.
:Lewis
:
:
:Thanks Lewis,
:I have checked the tubes over and over and they are fine, life test ok. I measure about 1 and third negative volts. I do think it should be higher. I used new caps but now I'm thinking about lowering the value of caps involved in the AVC and see what happens. The schematic is hard to read and based on what I measured the old ones and a guess I could be off. I did look at the other similiar Stromberg schematics. I do know the set plays loud and clear. The meter reads about 850 ohms if I recall right.
:Bill
:
:
:
:
:I am not sure about that AVC Voltage, seems to me it should be lower (more negative) if you have a fairly strong station. Help, anyone?
:Lewis
:
:
:
:
:Correct Lewis, more negative.
:Bill
:
:
:


© 1989-2025, Nostalgia Air