Sir Charles. . . . .
I can certainly see that you might have some exxxxtreme problems coming up with that original RR782 ballas for your set.
That set used s o o o o , many tubes along with a mixing of different filament ratings, that they had to have two separate series strings of those tubes.
Usually there is but one series stringing arrangement of the tubes filaments, and then the need of a sole resistance value within the ballast tube to make up the voltage drop to match with line voltage, less the pilot lamp(s).
And then, there is another resistance value within the balllast to additionallly shunt the pilot lamp(s) filament , and end up with that arrangement also being inserted in the final series of the filament string.
Check out the referencing of your set below, and at the [ A ] perspective you will see the sets treatment of the ballast aspect.
The [ B ] portion is giving a break out and separation of the two different current strings.
Now with due consideration of initially checking out the universal series of ballasts . . . having optionally selectable resistance values . . . and seeing none that would even remotely match up with getting the desired resistance characteristics for this set. I then could only see the use of two ballasts, and EVEN that not being totally sufficient either. That would not justify an $18-36 investment for ballasts to experiment with.
The next consideraton of the use of power resistors was not looking to good from the perspective of an extra 8W + 13W + 6 watts of wasted power and extra heating floating about inside.
Soooooooo, if that was my set, and problem to be solved I would do as I have plotted out down on [ C ] perspective.
A circuitry run down:
I have assigned references [ A ]-[ T ] to the different filamental nodes. I have taken the [A]-[M] of the 150 ma tubes and then
" folded them over ", so that they ended up being paired off with each other to then place sets in parallel, with the exception of the 6N5 which needed a series resistor to make it an equivalency of a 12 volt filament tube @ 150 ma.
Since the 12SF5 was the tube that could be the most sensitive to stray hum pick up from its H-K internals, it remained at the very closest to ground potential for its filament source, this then made the "fold over" occur at the 12J5 pairs junction.
The other end leg was the 40 ohm leg at [M] which ties in to 12FS5's [A]. There was an option of two paralleled 36 volt strings of tubes, BUT, also from the induced hum perspective, the pairs were shunted at the [B-C-L-K] and [D-E-J-H] nodes.
With that string set up, then there is the need of the tie in to the " O-fish-ull " 300 Ma tubes by connecting [F-G] node to the
[N] node of the 25CG6 tube.
The end of the 300 mA string at [ T ] gets connected to the pilot light cluster which has received a shunting resistor of 220 ohms at 2 W metal film resistor along with two Zener diodes shunting the duo.
The shunt resistor makes the otherwise 250 Ma lamps conform with the 300 mA characteristics of the new filament string.
The Zener diodes take care of voltage hold down of the pilot filaments supply level.
Particularly, if the set is turned off, then flipped back on within a few seconds. (Did he just say what I think he said ! . . . like he was going to say it again ? )
The 6-8v spread spec of the series #44 lamps . . now at . . . 12-16 v, fall right in the high end of that 15V clamp level, yet those diodes presence, will be transparent, circuit wise, after the set fully warms up.
Final Info:
The original schematics RED x's signify the insertion points of the revised wiring to the old wiring of the set. The red bars designate the delineation points of the old ballast circuitry.
The assignment of the [A] - [T] designators is also coincident with their being properly associated with the 2 & 7's and the
7 & 8's sets of the tube filament connections, as they are NOT designated on the schematic, and only your chassis examination will reveal that.
When all logged down there, is very little chance of making a wiring error when consulting against them and then making a very final point by point check out .
Thassit . . . . .
Concurrent Referencing:

73's de Edd