I am not much of an ipod person, but I suspect that the ipod output is intended to drive a low impedance (8 or 16 ohms) device such as headphones. A tube-type radio with a phono jack is looking for a high impedance input, in the order of 10,000 ohms or more. You probably need a matching transformer between the two.
::Hello everyone, I have an RCA Victor X551 with a phono jack on the back. I love nostalgic music and would love to hear it out of the RCA. I bought all the parts needed to "hook up" an Ipod with the desired music but it would not play. I took it out sprayed the contacts of the radio in and out and still nothing. I removed the jacks fearing damage to either the radio or the Ipod. Any hints or articles on accomplishing this?
::Paul
:
:I am not much of an ipod person, but I suspect that the ipod output is intended to drive a low impedance (8 or 16 ohms) device such as headphones. A tube-type radio with a phono jack is looking for a high impedance input, in the order of 10,000 ohms or more. You probably need a matching transformer between the two.
:Ed, I am also not an Ipod person but love the old music on demand instead of searching for weak stations on AM. so.........
:Do you know of a such a transformer or like device to power it, and does it need to be mounted and powered from within the radio cabinet?
:Paul
:
:
:::Hello everyone, I have an RCA Victor X551 with a phono jack on the back. I love nostalgic music and would love to hear it out of the RCA. I bought all the parts needed to "hook up" an Ipod with the desired music but it would not play. I took it out sprayed the contacts of the radio in and out and still nothing. I removed the jacks fearing damage to either the radio or the Ipod. Any hints or articles on accomplishing this?
:::Paul
::
::I am not much of an ipod person, but I suspect that the ipod output is intended to drive a low impedance (8 or 16 ohms) device such as headphones. A tube-type radio with a phono jack is looking for a high impedance input, in the order of 10,000 ohms or more. You probably need a matching transformer between the two.
:i have hooked up an ipod to an rca 9x561 i think with the phono jack on the back. slide switch to phono position and set the ipod volume to make sure there is no overdriving. maybe your connecting cables are shorting the signal out somehow? the ipod output is stereo - how are you converting to the mono connection of the rca?
:
::Ed, I am also not an Ipod person but love the old music on demand instead of searching for weak stations on AM. so.........
::Do you know of a such a transformer or like device to power it, and does it need to be mounted and powered from within the radio cabinet?
::Paul
::
::
::::Hello everyone, I have an RCA Victor X551 with a phono jack on the back. I love nostalgic music and would love to hear it out of the RCA. I bought all the parts needed to "hook up" an Ipod with the desired music but it would not play. I took it out sprayed the contacts of the radio in and out and still nothing. I removed the jacks fearing damage to either the radio or the Ipod. Any hints or articles on accomplishing this?
::::Paul
:::
:::I am not much of an ipod person, but I suspect that the ipod output is intended to drive a low impedance (8 or 16 ohms) device such as headphones. A tube-type radio with a phono jack is looking for a high impedance input, in the order of 10,000 ohms or more. You probably need a matching transformer between the two.
:Rob, that may be the problem. How would I convert (device) stereo to mono?
:Thank you,
:Paul
:
::i have hooked up an ipod to an rca 9x561 i think with the phono jack on the back. slide switch to phono position and set the ipod volume to make sure there is no overdriving. maybe your connecting cables are shorting the signal out somehow? the ipod output is stereo - how are you converting to the mono connection of the rca?
::
:::Ed, I am also not an Ipod person but love the old music on demand instead of searching for weak stations on AM. so.........
:::Do you know of a such a transformer or like device to power it, and does it need to be mounted and powered from within the radio cabinet?
:::Paul
:::
:::
:::::Hello everyone, I have an RCA Victor X551 with a phono jack on the back. I love nostalgic music and would love to hear it out of the RCA. I bought all the parts needed to "hook up" an Ipod with the desired music but it would not play. I took it out sprayed the contacts of the radio in and out and still nothing. I removed the jacks fearing damage to either the radio or the Ipod. Any hints or articles on accomplishing this?
:::::Paul
::::
::::I am not much of an ipod person, but I suspect that the ipod output is intended to drive a low impedance (8 or 16 ohms) device such as headphones. A tube-type radio with a phono jack is looking for a high impedance input, in the order of 10,000 ohms or more. You probably need a matching transformer between the two.
:i have hooked up an ipod to an rca 9x561 i think with the phono jack on the back. slide switch to phono position and set the ipod volume to make sure there is no overdriving. maybe your connecting cables are shorting the signal out somehow? the ipod output is stereo - how are you converting to the mono connection of the rca?
:
::Ed, I am also not an Ipod person but love the old music on demand instead of searching for weak stations on AM. so.........
::Do you know of a such a transformer or like device to power it, and does it need to be mounted and powered from within the radio cabinet?
::Paul
::
::
::::Hello everyone, I have an RCA Victor X551 with a phono jack on the back. I love nostalgic music and would love to hear it out of the RCA. I bought all the parts needed to "hook up" an Ipod with the desired music but it would not play. I took it out sprayed the contacts of the radio in and out and still nothing. I removed the jacks fearing damage to either the radio or the Ipod. Any hints or articles on accomplishing this?
::::Paul
:::
:::I am not much of an ipod person, but I suspect that the ipod output is intended to drive a low impedance (8 or 16 ohms) device such as headphones. A tube-type radio with a phono jack is looking for a high impedance input, in the order of 10,000 ohms or more. You probably need a matching transformer between the two.
How's about grabbing yourself a couple of plugs with their wiring and associative discreeeet dee-vices and then you fashion
your self an interfacing impedance matching pad.
Typically,using both R & L channels of the players output tied together, as that is what is done when using an ancillary "Y"
stereo to mono wiring connector.
After built up and ready for evaluation, toy with the pods volume to see what level it will have to be brought up to achive
an adequate input level to the Ruuuh-Cee-Aye's for its desired volume control range setting.
Wiring as per:
73's de Edd
Sir Edd:
Why Z1?
Lewis
::
::
::
::
::
::
::
::
::
::
::
::
::How's about grabbing yourself a couple of plugs with their wiring and associative discreeeet dee-vices and then you fashion
::your self an interfacing impedance matching pad.
::
::
::
::Typically,using both R & L channels of the players output tied together, as that is what is done when using an ancillary "Y"
::stereo to mono wiring connector.
::
::
::After built up and ready for evaluation, toy with the pods volume to see what level it will have to be brought up to achive
::an adequate input level to the Ruuuh-Cee-Aye's for its desired volume control range setting.
Z1 and Z2 are markings, indicating the impedance. They aren't real components.
Best Regards,
Bill Grimm
::Edd, forgive me, I am somewhat confused in the components that I have to purchase. I have a stereo (I pod side) to mono Connector(RCA)radio side from radio shack.
::Each side fits the Pod and the radio, it does not look
::Like a “Y”. One side plugs into the pod (Male) and the Other Side (Female) houses an RCA
::The Radio sound shuts off when the plug is inserted into the radio as it should, but no pod sound comes out of the radio.
::On the schematic I believe there are 2 resistors 10K and 10 ohm that I have to purchase?
::What is a Z1 and Z2 and where would I get them?
::Paul
::
::
::
::
::
::
::
::::
::::
::::
::::
::::
::::
::::
::::
::::
::::
::::
::::
::::How's about grabbing yourself a couple of plugs with their wiring and associative discreeeet dee-vices and then you fashion
::::your self an interfacing impedance matching pad.
::::
::::
::::
::::Typically,using both R & L channels of the players output tied together, as that is what is done when using an ancillary "Y"
::::stereo to mono wiring connector.
::::
::::
::::After built up and ready for evaluation, toy with the pods volume to see what level it will have to be brought up to achive
::::an adequate input level to the Ruuuh-Cee-Aye's for its desired volume control range setting.
:Rob, great point, I do not have a slide, it's just a phono jack in the back. Perhaps I am shorting it out.Is there a device that brings the stereo sound together to mono to hear all of the sounds? instead of the standard couplings that I have used. Also, which volume should be used? I have tried both however.
:Thank you,
:Paul
:
:
::i have hooked up an ipod to an rca 9x561 i think with the phono jack on the back. slide switch to phono position and set the ipod volume to make sure there is no overdriving. maybe your connecting cables are shorting the signal out somehow? the ipod output is stereo - how are you converting to the mono connection of the rca?
::
:::Ed, I am also not an Ipod person but love the old music on demand instead of searching for weak stations on AM. so.........
:::Do you know of a such a transformer or like device to power it, and does it need to be mounted and powered from within the radio cabinet?
:::Paul
:::
:::
:::::Hello everyone, I have an RCA Victor X551 with a phono jack on the back. I love nostalgic music and would love to hear it out of the RCA. I bought all the parts needed to "hook up" an Ipod with the desired music but it would not play. I took it out sprayed the contacts of the radio in and out and still nothing. I removed the jacks fearing damage to either the radio or the Ipod. Any hints or articles on accomplishing this?
:::::Paul
::::
::::I am not much of an ipod person, but I suspect that the ipod output is intended to drive a low impedance (8 or 16 ohms) device such as headphones. A tube-type radio with a phono jack is looking for a high impedance input, in the order of 10,000 ohms or more. You probably need a matching transformer between the two.
For further clarification:
Sir Lewis. . . .
Ripped off all of that post in about 10 minutes and saw that the reduction of the graphics on the input and output
mottled it somewhat on definition, and now see that the graphics might have vaguely resembled a SS supressor symbol used for peak AF limiting. . . .but
nothing like THOSE AF levels are going to be present here. What the clarified graphic was, is a scope face depiction of a single sine waveform.
Depicting the stronger AF level present on the input and the resultant decreased amplitude being shown on the pad output side, but really needing to be reduced in size even far greater than I have it !
Sir Paul:
The initially depicted 10 ohm value was a center common value between the 8-16 ohm value that someone mentioned, researching the Sony I-pod
specs shows the 'pod earbuds at 16 ohms Z.
Soooooo you might opt between the common obtainable resistor values of 15, 27 or 33 ohms for that bottom load resistor value, with the higher value
creating higher AF p/to/p voltage, if it seems to be required by that RCA audio system. The very low bass response will taper down, but that speaker response in the RCA will never know about it, what with its limited lower end bass response capabilities.
On testing out, you might even find that with the volume on the 'pod at its upper level, it might still be a bit on the weak side on the available input to the RCA, if so, incrementally walk down the value of the 10K resistor.
A slight mismatch certainly beats a gross mismatching, like dumping the 'pod straight into the RCA would.
The break in the one channel of the 'pod headphone output was suggesting your initially testing a sole output to see how the level is, and then jump in the additional channel to confirm that the volume did not drop appreciably and the stereo effect was swung in.
The 'pods schema shows to have capacitive isolation in the outputs but IF you still experience an appreciable drop, consult the info Sir Tom provided on further capacitive isolation of the
two channels.
Sir Bill:
You'se dun won yer self. . . . . the "Super Sharp Eyed Silver Eagle Award". . . . for properly interpreting the graphics. . . . albeit fuzzy !
Lastly on the RCA radio's schematic, it definitely shows a switched action jack on that radio which disconnects the radio and solely has the top of the volume control receiving the phono cartridges input. One rare possibility is that the center connector/pin of the RCA plug that you are using is not going in far enough to engage that switching action.
Now -a - days all of the RCA plugs have that shorter length center connector pin, in the olden days the PREMIUM plugs even had a ceramic / bisque porcelain insulator supporting that center pin, or on the cheaper versions, a heavy cardboard insulator disc. Quick melting plastic is the norm now.
AND there was a short and a long connector pin option between different manufacturers. Look inside and check that possibility of the switch not being engaged.
In my early high school days all of my friends were errand-lawn work-carry out bag boys, while my easy money was coming in from modifying peoples
radios. They would buy the cheaper 45 RPM RCA automatic turntables instead of the much more expensive unit with the amp and cabinetry. I would than install
an RCA phono jack on their radios rear chassis apron and then go over to the osc section of the variable tuning condenser and ever so slightly peen a burr on the extreme
end of the rotor. In that manner when the radio was fully tuned to the 550 portion, the oscillator would disable ANY radio sound / static from the phono audio.
Newer Reference:
For further clarification:
Sir Lewis. . . .
Ripped off all of that post in about 10 minutes and saw that the reduction of the graphics on the input and output
mottled it somewhat on definition, and now see that the graphics might have vaguely resembled a SS supressor symbol used for peak AF limiting. . . .but
nothing like THOSE AF levels are going to be present here. What the clarified graphic was, is a scope face depiction of a single sine waveform.
Depicting the stronger AF level present on the input and the resultant decreased amplitude being shown on the pad output side, but really needing to be reduced in size even far greater than I have it !
Sir Paul:
The initially depicted 10 ohm value was a center common value between the 8-16 ohm value that someone mentioned, researching the Sony I-pod
specs shows the 'pod earbuds at 16 ohms Z.
Soooooo you might opt between the common obtainable resistor values of 15, 27 or 33 ohms for that bottom load resistor value, with the higher value
creating higher AF p/to/p voltage, if it seems to be required by that RCA audio system. The very low bass response will taper down, but that speaker response in the RCA will never know about it, what with its limited lower end bass response capabilities.
On testing out, you might even find that with the volume on the 'pod at its upper level, it might still be a bit on the weak side on the available input to the RCA, if so, incrementally walk down the value of the 10K resistor.
A slight mismatch certainly beats a gross mismatching, like dumping the 'pod straight into the RCA would.
The break in the one channel of the 'pod headphone output was suggesting your initially testing a sole output to see how the level is, and then jump in the additional channel to confirm that the volume did not drop appreciably and the stereo effect was swung in.
The 'pods schema shows to have capacitive isolation in the outputs but IF you still experience an appreciable drop, consult the info Sir Tom provided on further capacitive isolation of the
two channels.
Sir Bill:
You'se dun won yer self. . . . . the "Super Sharp Eyed Silver Eagle Award". . . . for properly interpreting the graphics. . . . albeit fuzzy !
Lastly on the RCA radio's schematic, it definitely shows a switched action jack on that radio which disconnects the radio and solely has the top of the volume control receiving the phono cartridges input. One rare possibility is that the center connector/pin of the RCA plug that you are using is not going in far enough to engage that switching action.
Now -a - days all of the RCA plugs have that shorter length center connector pin, in the olden days the PREMIUM plugs even had a ceramic / bisque porcelain insulator supporting that center pin, or on the cheaper versions, a heavy cardboard insulator disc. Quick melting plastic is the norm now.
AND there was a short and a long connector pin option between different manufacturers. Look inside and check that possibility of the switch not being engaged.
In my early high school days all of my friends were errand-lawn work-carry out bag boys, while my easy money was coming in from modifying peoples
radios. They would buy the cheaper 45 RPM RCA automatic turntables instead of the much more expensive unit with the amp and cabinetry. I would than install
an RCA phono jack on their radios rear chassis apron and then go over to the osc section of the variable tuning condenser and ever so slightly peen a burr on the extreme
end of the rotor. In that manner when the radio was fully tuned to the 550 portion, the oscillator would disable ANY radio sound / static from the phono audio.
Newer Reference:
73's de Edd
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:For further clarification:
:
:
:
:
:Sir Lewis. . . .
:Ripped off all of that post in about 10 minutes and saw that the reduction of the graphics on the input and output
: mottled it somewhat on definition, and now see that the graphics might have vaguely resembled a SS supressor symbol used for peak AF limiting. . . .but
:nothing like THOSE AF levels are going to be present here. What the clarified graphic was, is a scope face depiction of a single sine waveform.
:Depicting the stronger AF level present on the input and the resultant decreased amplitude being shown on the pad output side, but really needing to be reduced in size even far greater than I have it !
:
: