Tom
Should that referencing that you found supplied, be too old…antiquated…. of a Philco…check this out and see if this is your unit in question:
http://www.nostalgiaair.org/PagesByModel/597/M0013597.pdf
73's de Edd
:Should that referencing that you found supplied, be too old…antiquated…. of a Philco…check this out and see if this is your unit in question:
:
:
:
:
:
:
: http://www.nostalgiaair.org/PagesByModel/597/M0013597.pdf
:
:
:73's de Edd
Thanks for you reply. The Philco 46-420 (121)is very similar to the model 64. But the schematic is actually different The 46 420 was made in the USA and the Model 64 was made in Canada. They do look identical on the outside. One difference that is immediately apparent is that the 7C7 RF amp has been replaced with a 7B7. Once you see the under side of the radio further inconsitancies are apparent.
I was familiar with the interchange of the 7B7…7C7 of the Canadian versus the U.S. version of the Hippo, but compare the reference pics and see if any other changes are evident. Particularly, as if your unit has the RF transformer (item 39) mounted under chassis as shown.
Schematic + Bottom chassis + Top chassis layouts:
73's de Edd
Thanks for the pictures of the chasis layout for the radio. Item 39, the rf transformer is on the under side as shown in your picture. The electrolytic capacitor, Item 7, is different. It is a 3 way capacitor 40, 20 and 5 instead of a 20 and 20. Also capacitor #16 on your top cahsis layout isn't on my radio; not sure why. I've been looking everywhere but still can't find the schematic for model 64. Also I can't get a dc voltage reading over 28 volts on any tube. 35Z5 checks out as good on the tester as do all the other tubes. I'm thinking there must be a short somewhere along the path
Thanks again
Tom
I have that Schematic for your Canadian Philco 64. I will need your email address to send it to you.
Dennis
Hi Dennis.
Thanks for replying to my message and offering me a copy of this schematic. My Email address is tblack@csolve.net .
Thanks for your help
Tom
Dennis
Thanks for the Schematic. I appreciate your help.
Tom