Thanks
David
:I am looking for a schematic for this or more in formation. The schematic here online is very hard to read.
:Thanks
:David
You can get a clean schematic from A. G. Tannenbaum at http://www.agtannenbaum.com/default.htm but it will cost you 8 bucks or so. That's the most readable one I have ever seen....Neal
:Yes, when you zoom in on the schematic the values are hard to make out, they get fuzzy.
I don't know where you are located, but I'm located near a large city and my public library has a complete set of Riders and Sams for only 10 cents a copy.
David R
:
:I don't know where you are located, but I'm located near a large city and my public library has a complete set of Riders and Sams for only 10 cents a copy.
:
:David R
then what is your problem?
:
Neal I think David R is giving advice to David.
::
:
:Neal I think David R is giving advice to David.
okay, I think this is where I phase out of this entire screwy conversation.
Here was my interpreted slant on the ensuing posts and their specific semantics.
David #1 ….I can’t make out enough detail on the schematic supplied…is a better copy available ?
(David #1…I agree with you 100 and lebenteen percent…I certainly couldn’t do an individual component sweep of every unit in that set with that schematic copy. Even my Riders CD was deficient to the same degree, but if a person was only needed SOME few parts, if one additionally looks at the bottom chassis layout, one can actually make out the values of a high percentage of the parts.
Plus….. this SVC info is one of the few that additionally gives the rough values of resistance expected to be found in a resistance to ground analysis. Additionally, the typical voltage levels to be expected at most of the B+ power distribution nodes.)
Neal inquires about the clarity…..
( I repeat, I certainly couldn’t work with that schematic copy, excepting for a few parts. )
DAVID…back with...
Yes, when you zoom in on the schematic the values are hard to make out, they get fuzzy.
( A trade off in copying from a printed media and its transition into a digital format. Do we have to have resolution being used (like 1.2 megapixels) that was in excess of resolving needs of the basic printed format?
Which, on this sites quite massive archives, would require the utilization of all of the servers and data storage reserve of Silicon Valley.
Or, more realistically, the relaxed utilization of a 200-300 DPI sampling rate.
And even at that , there is the inherent deficiency of the manually drafted copy where the X-Y layout can infringe into a persons rough hand drawn schematic at times. Then there is the individual ‘’ lettering’’ which can vary every time….not good at all, if trying to deploy modern digital Optical Character Recognition on copy.
Then Neal offers an alternative for second sourcing of a schematic thru Tannenbaum.
Then DAVID R.. and heavy on the Ruh to differentiate the two ….comes in with yet another sourcing…( but I can get my copies for 5 cents…Collegiate sourced )
Neal then comes back with …….then what is your problem ? Therefore, it additionally looks like Sir…..JK…… was also thinking the same as I, in interpreting the verbiage. Soooo for my part….I will consult Riders #7 for its copy and if it digitalizes with satisfactory resolution, I will make up a large reference for you………DAVID #1….(freebie…freebie…freebie).
( This being the point where all of the fuzzy logic, transcendental unilateral equations and reverse Polish logic fully kicks in. )
1….. Neal has interpreted the reply being from David #1, who now has the available sourcing just referred by Neal , seemedly along with his own statement of there even being a CHEAPER sourcing of that schematic via HIS local Pub Lib sourcing.
2.....BUT that additional info tidbit was ACTUALLY from David Ruuuh.
(But it will be taking a few days to made a coinciding trip for access to the storage area of ye olde musty Red Ryder manuals and teardown and replacement of the lamp in my HP scanner [ 5 years trouble free... until just last week!] )
73's de Edd
David