Home  Resources  References  Tubes  Forums  Links  Support 
Noise with dimmer switch
12/7/2006 1:00:39 AMBen M.
I am getting a super loud buzz when I turn on my incondescent lamp in the room where my am radio is. The duplex is on the same circuit as the light. Are the scr's in the dimmer creating line noise and if so how do I remove it?
12/7/2006 1:25:23 AMThomas Dermody
Yep! Place a .1 MFD condenser (250 WVDC found at Radio Shack) across the dimmer's leads. If that doesn't work, place a 100 mH choke (also found at Radio Shack) on each lead of the dimmer. Also, along with the chokes, try placing a .1 MFD condenser across the dimmer leads on the dimmer side of the chokes, and also one on the wiring side of the chokes. Try with one, the other, and then both. Do not place condensers across each choke, as this will nullify their action.

Thomas

12/7/2006 2:29:45 AMeasyrider8
If you are going to use capacitors on 120 VAC use capacitors rated for X or Y service. Using a 250 VDC capacitor is a fire hazzard.

Dave

___________________________________________________________________

:Yep! Place a .1 MFD condenser (250 WVDC found at Radio Shack) across the dimmer's leads. If that doesn't work, place a 100 mH choke (also found at Radio Shack) on each lead of the dimmer. Also, along with the chokes, try placing a .1 MFD condenser across the dimmer leads on the dimmer side of the chokes, and also one on the wiring side of the chokes. Try with one, the other, and then both. Do not place condensers across each choke, as this will nullify their action.
:
:Thomas

12/7/2006 3:28:57 AMPeter G. Balazsy
how'bout .1uf @ 630vdc
12/7/2006 10:19:33 AMBen M.
Can I take care of the filtration inside my chassis. I was thinking about adding a couple of inductors in series with the ac lines and then a .1mfd in parallel.
12/7/2006 11:18:02 AMRadiodoc
Ben M.,

Generally you locate the source of the noise and use components between the noisy device and the line. Components inside the chassis may reduce the noise if it is entering the radio from the power line. However, if the noise is being radiated from the AC wiring in the house into the antenna of the radio, then adding filtering in the radio probably wont help. You may try using a portable transistor radio to try to determine if the noise is being transmitted thru the AC wiring to the radio or being radiated from the AC wiring.

Radiodoc


:Can I take care of the filtration inside my chassis. I was thinking about adding a couple of inductors in series with the ac lines and then a .1mfd in parallel.

12/8/2006 8:02:16 AMBen M.
Once again Radiodoc gets the prize. My dimmer was putting out RF from the scr's so all of the line filtration in the world would not have helped.
12/8/2006 5:05:16 PMThomas Dermody
Line filtration does help. It won't cure everything, but it will help. Trust me. If you filter it out right at the dimmer, you'll prevent the wiring in your home from transmitting, too, which will help a lot. If you can cut down the majority of transmission both through the air and through the wiring, you'll reduce the interference over all, even if some is still received. I've installed filters on my dimmers, and they do help quite a bit. I have dimmers just like the dimmers everyone else has, and I have tube radios just like your's, so I do believe that my results will be the same as your's if you try the filters. My worst is the touch dimmer for the halogen lights in my kitchen. I only put two .1 MFD condenser across the input AC and the output AC, and they helped quite a bit. Things could be better if I had room for chokes. With the lights all the way up, reception is fair. The dimmer in my dining room puts out almost no static. It has a condenser inside and nothing else.

Thomas

12/7/2006 2:01:12 PMBen M.
I took a look at the 100mH choke at Radio Shack and the wires look pretty thin. If put in series with the power line how could this carry a load?
12/7/2006 3:22:48 PMThomas Dermody
Those chokes can easily handle 400 watts at 120 volts (not at 12 volts....that'd be a TON of amperage). If you like you can parallel them, though this reduces their effectiveness. You can also wind ones with thicker wire. Use the same turn count. They'll be thicker, though. You might not be able to fit them in the wall box. Be sure to insulate well.

What everyone else says is very true. My recommending 250 volt regular condensers isn't the greatest idea, though I've seen many old radios with 200 volt line condensers. I have also used the 250 volt blue .1 MFD condensers from Radio Shack quite successfully in both radios and dimmers. It isn't the greatest idea, though. It's best to use one of those safety condensers rated for at least 400 volts, if not 600.

Regarding putting the chokes in your radio, this will work well. It may even be necessary if there isn't enough room in the switch box. However, like everyone says, catching the noise at its source is the best. Also, if you place the chokes on the line of the radio, you'll reduce the radio's reception capability. If it's an AC radio, all you have to do is make an alternate ground to a water or radiator pipe. If it's an AC/DC set, though, you can't do that. If you must put the chokes inside of your radio, put one on each side of the line cord. Wire a condenser of the type mentioned above (preferrably a safety cap.) across the radio side of the chokes. You can also wire one across the AC cord side if you wish, but this might increase interference. Try one on each side and then one on both sides, and see which way works the best. You can also try putting a choke on only one side of the line cord (the hot side, which is normally the side not switched in old radios). I have found that in some cases this works fairly well as long as you plug in the radio with this side in the small hole of the outlet (the hot side of the outlet). Connect a condenser across from the radio side of the choke to the other side of the line cord. Also try one on the line cord side of the choke to the other side of the line cord. Try both. Sometimes one way works better than the others. I have most often had the least success with condensers on both sides of the choke(s).

Another thing I have seen with the double chokes method is to connect two condensers in series on each side of the chokes, and then connect their junction points to the chassis. Again, try two on one side of the chokes, then on the other, and finally on both sides (4 condensers total).

Finally, if you can't fit the chokes inside of the switch box, or they won't work for the load you have, put them inside of the radio, but still put a .1 MFD safety condenser across the leads of the dimmer. If you want, pull the dimmer out of the wall and remove the wire nuts from its leads. Turn on the fuse after separating the wires so that they can't touch eachother or the box. Carefully, with one hand, turn on the dimmer so that the light lights. Turn on your radio. Listen to the static. Then carefully touch a .1 MFD safety condenser across the dimmer leads and see if this helps things.

Thomas

12/7/2006 4:21:18 PMBen M.
:The radio originally used a .005 cap from one leg(before the power switch) to ground. Scheamtic shows that. BAD idea! I found that that the voltage winds up charging the power transformer and there is voltage in the chassis when the power switch is off. Its a "fake" 30vac but never the less it's there. I tried the caps from the a/c line to gnd and it made things worse, can you believe that. I was thinking about using a MOV in parallel with the dimmer and see if that works. Why would chokes in the power line kill my incoming radio signal?
12/7/2006 5:31:52 PMThomas Dermody
A condenser from one leg of the AC cord to ground? The chassis in your radio is not ground. The purpose of a condenser from the AC cord to the chassis is to actually link the chassis to the AC cord for reception purposes since the AC cord eventually leads to the earth since part of the electrical system in your home is grounded. This is for reception purposes only (the reason why your home electrical system is grounded is another, or actually several). The earth acts like an antenna, or is a member of the many things that radio waves alternate back and forth through.

The .005 MFD condenser from the AC cord to the chassis is not absolutely necessary. There is also some capacitive coupling through the power transformer, though not as much as through the condenser. The condenser will improve reception somewhat, as will connecting the chassis to an alternate source of ground.

What you should do to minimize interference, aside from the choke ideas I gave you, is connect a condenser from one AC leg to the other in your radio. Do this on the radio side of the switch. The condenser that goes from the AC cord to the chassis is not there to reduce interference, contrary to what some misinformed individuals will tell you.

Regarding shock hazards with condensers tied to the chassis, all you need to do is keep your fingers off of sources of ground and you won't get shocked. Even if you omit the condenser, there is still capacitive coupling through the power transformer, and the slight chance for shock, especially if your fingers are wet. Leave the radio the way it is. It is designed well. If you wish to add filtering devices such as those I mentioned, do so. Don't modify the radio just so that you don't get shocks from the chassis. All you have to do is use your head and then you won't get shocks from the chassis. You can also get shocks from your television and VCR if you touch the RF cable jack and a ground source at the same time, etc. Don't do that and you won't get shocked.

Thomas

12/7/2006 7:25:42 PMDoug Criner
The voltage you are measuring is not dangerous. Any high-impedance voltmeter will measure voltage through such a capacitor. Olden voltmeters had low enough input impedance that such voltages were not measurable.

Use a polarized line cord and put the power switch on on the hot leg (the one with a narrow blade on the AC plug). Then you will not measure a voltage with the power switch OFF.

I would replace the line-to-chassis cap with a UL safety cap. Place the cap on the radio-side of the power switch.


::The radio originally used a .005 cap from one leg(before the power switch) to ground. Scheamtic shows that. BAD idea! I found that that the voltage winds up charging the power transformer and there is voltage in the chassis when the power switch is off. Its a "fake" 30vac but never the less it's there. I tried the caps from the a/c line to gnd and it made things worse, can you believe that. I was thinking about using a MOV in parallel with the dimmer and see if that works. Why would chokes in the power line kill my incoming radio signal?

12/7/2006 9:08:50 PMCarl C
:The voltage you are measuring is not dangerous. Any high-impedance voltmeter will measure voltage through such a capacitor. Olden voltmeters had low enough input impedance that such voltages were not measurable.
:
:Use a polarized line cord and put the power switch on on the hot leg (the one with a narrow blade on the AC plug). Then you will not measure a voltage with the power switch OFF.
:
:I would replace the line-to-chassis cap with a UL safety cap. Place the cap on the radio-side of the power switch.
:
:
:::The radio originally used a .005 cap from one leg(before the power switch) to ground. Scheamtic shows that. BAD idea! I found that that the voltage winds up charging the power transformer and there is voltage in the chassis when the power switch is off. Its a "fake" 30vac but never the less it's there. I tried the caps from the a/c line to gnd and it made things worse, can you believe that. I was thinking about using a MOV in parallel with the dimmer and see if that works. Why would chokes in the power line kill my incoming radio signal?
12/7/2006 9:15:40 PMCarl C.
::The voltage you are measuring is not dangerous. Any high-impedance voltmeter will measure voltage through such a capacitor. Olden voltmeters had low enough input impedance that such voltages were not measurable.
::
::Use a polarized line cord and put the power switch on on the hot leg (the one with a narrow blade on the AC plug). Then you will not measure a voltage with the power switch OFF.
::
::I would replace the line-to-chassis cap with a UL safety cap. Place the cap on the radio-side of the power switch.
::
::
::::The radio originally used a .005 cap from one leg(before the power switch) to ground. Scheamtic shows that. BAD idea! I found that that the voltage winds up charging the power transformer and there is voltage in the chassis when the power switch is off. Its a "fake" 30vac but never the less it's there. I tried the caps from the a/c line to gnd and it made things worse, can you believe that. I was thinking about using a MOV in parallel with the dimmer and see if that works. Why would chokes in the power line kill my incoming radio signal? Safety caps available at JustRadios - see this info at http://www.justradios.com/X1Y2capacitors.html
12/7/2006 9:09:28 PMBen M.
If you look at the Riders schematic for a 7a04 chassis Phonograph addendum, you will see a .005 cap to chassis BEFORE the power switch. Very strange and other chassis like the 6a04 and 8a03 deleted it or put it after the switch.
12/7/2006 10:36:24 PMThomas Dermody
If you put the switch on the hot side of the cord, then you'll want the condenser on the other side of the line cord so that it connects to the cold side. Since this is an AC radio, there really is no preference as far as wiring goes. Both wires go to the transformer primary. If you wish to polarize the radio so that it's safer (I think that people are somewhat parinoid when they do this because these radios are already safe so long as you don't grab them and a water pipe at the same time...easy enough unless you have turrets or something), have the large prong of the plug wired to the non-switched side. Have the small prong wired to the switched side. Connect the chassis to line cord condenser to the non-switched side of the line cord since this will be your cold side.

If you wish to leave the wiring in its conventional form, put the condenser on the switch side either before or after the switch. Putting it before the switch is wisest if you always plug the radio in with the switch on the cold side, for if it's on the radio side of the switch, it'll become hot when the switch is turned off. I really don't think that all of this is as important as some people make it out to be. It makes me think of times when people think up stuff when they have nothing else to think up. Just keep your hands off of a source of ground while working on the chassis and you'll be just fine.

Thomas

12/8/2006 12:03:11 AMplanigan
I am also concerned that the chassis has a potential on it due to the line caps as well as the fact that a lot of the radios had the power switch on the ground leg and putting the caps before the switch. You end up with the caps being across the line all the time the set is plugged in, a hot chassis with the power switch open and a current flow through the caps to the chassis. I moved the caps to after the switch, have the switch on the high side and decressed the caps to .01 mfd from .015mfd. I question whether puting the cap on the ground side of the chassis would be a good idea. It's my understanding that the caps were used as RF filters on the AC line. Placing a cap between the ground of the AC line in the chassis would be placing it from gnd to gnd. I would think it should go from hot side to chassis to affect the RF interferance. PL
12/8/2006 12:49:42 AMThomas Dermody
Hmmmmmmm....................

I think I'm going to go to sleep now. Too much to explain. Not enough brain power left to explain it. I don't know where people get these wild misconceptions about ground and such, and I wish that the chassis in a radio would never ever be referred to as ground again. It isn't ground. It is simply a large metal object that's used as a big wire. If it wasn't connected to anything at all, it would simply be a metal box.

I don't care anymore, though. It's like the blind leading the blind, and I'm the fool on the hill that noone listens to.

Good night.

12/8/2006 8:04:58 AMBen M.
You dont have to think of yourself as a fool. Listen to Radiodoc.
12/8/2006 5:21:01 PMRadiodoc
Ben M.,

Did you replace the .005 cap? For safety, it would probably be a good idea. One rated 630 volts or better or even a safety cap (believe safety cap was mentioned earlier).

Radiodoc

:You dont have to think of yourself as a fool. Listen to Radiodoc.

12/8/2006 9:27:07 PMBen M.
Radio reception works better without the .005 cap to chassis. Factory installed (schematic documented)this prior to the on/off switch. Very strange and bad idea. Like you said it's RFI's and basically line filters wont do a darn thing. Apples and oranges.
12/8/2006 9:52:51 PMRadiodoc
:Radio reception works better without the .005 cap to chassis. Factory installed (schematic documented)this prior to the on/off switch. Very strange and bad idea. Like you said it's RFI's and basically line filters wont do a darn thing. Apples and oranges.

Ben M.,

I just wanted you to be safe. If it works better without it, leave it out. Could have been the manufacturer determined there was no improvement in operation and left it out of later models. There are some light dimmers that have built-in noise suppression. They are generally more expensive than the ones at the discount stores. Radio Shack used to sell a unit that was sealed in a metal block with ears for mounting. A nearby Radio Shack a few years back was closing and selling out and I purchased several of these at I believe a buck apiece. I used a few in some applications by mounting them in the bottom of a double metallic outlet box, wiring them in and mounting a couple of duplex (3-wire) outlets on the box with a cover and about a two-foot pigtail with a three-wire plug on the end. Worked pretty well. I still have one of the setups on the workbench of the shop.

Radiodoc

12/8/2006 9:57:06 PMRadiodoc
:Radio reception works better without the .005 cap to chassis. Factory installed (schematic documented)this prior to the on/off switch. Very strange and bad idea. Like you said it's RFI's and basically line filters wont do a darn thing. Apples and oranges.

Ben M.,

In my post about the line filter, I forgot to mention the noise/interference was being transmitted thru the wiring and not being radiated from the wiring and was comming from outside and beyond my control.

Radiodoc

12/8/2006 11:05:15 PMThomas Dermody
Is radio reception stronger in all cases or does the static go away when the condenser is removed? If the static goes away, but overall reception does not get stronger (I doubt that it does), this is because the static is coming through the line cord. Removing the condenser removes the coupling to the line cord.

Thomas

12/8/2006 12:00:29 PMZ-
:Hmmmmmmm....................
:
:I don't know where people get these wild misconceptions about ground and such, and I wish that the chassis in a radio would never ever be referred to as ground again. It isn't ground. It is simply a large metal object that's used as a big wire. If it wasn't connected to anything at all, it would simply be a metal box.
:

Electricity.

1- A large conducting body, such as the earth or an electric circuit connected to the earth, used as an arbitrary zero of potential.

2- A conducting object, such as a wire, that is connected to such a position of zero potential.

Not a misconception but a fully understanding of electricity basics.

Z-

12/8/2006 5:00:41 PMThomas Dermody
Yeah, but when you refer to the chassis as ground, people confuse things and ask questions like why do you have to connect a condenser from the chassis to the line cord for an RF ground when the chassis already is ground. In other words, "why do you have to connect a ground to a ground?"

Truth is, the chassis isn't ground. The only thing that's ground is the ground itself. The only electrical thing that's ground electrically is anything that connects to the earth. Referring to every major common return or base plane as ground leads to conceptual confusion. I see it everywhere, and it just makes me want to smash my head against a wall. The only thing the chassis is is a common return of very large size. If, after you thoroughly understand how everything works, you want to refer to the chassis as ground, then do so, but keep it to yourself (you in general, not any specific person), because it confuses everyone else. People get this idea that because it's called a ground it has something magical about it. A CHASSIS AND THE EARTH ARE TWO ENTIRELY DIFFERENT THINGS. THEY ARE NOT AT ALL THE SAME. I capitalize for emphasis, not for shouting. They both can be used for a common return, but a chassis 'ground' is not at all the same as an earth 'ground'.

Now that I've had my rest, though, I once again have enough energy to properly explain everything without losing my mind. The chassis of your radio is not ground or earth. Let us never talk about ground again unless we're talking about a wire that actually goes to ground (earth). The condenser that goes from the chassis to the line cord is for a couple of reasons. For one it puts the chassis at the same AC potential as everything else in the room. This adds shielding and stability to the circuits. It keeps the chassis from picking up stray fields that might alter circuit performance. An ungrounded chassis might more likely cause the amplifier to hum, for instance. It might also allow oscillations to occur if the circuits can react with eachother through the chassis medium.

Also, the condenser between the chassis and earth affords better reception (my original key point that noone seems to understand). When radio waves eminate from the transmitter, they alternate back and forth through the antenna and earth. The planet Earth acts as the other side of the RF circuit. If you did not have Earth to connect to, you'd have to have another antenna on the other side of the transmitter output coil in order to complete the circuit (sort of like a balanced V doublet antenna, but not necessarily physically the same). Earth radiates, too. You could think of it as a return, but since radio waves are alternating current, they actually come out of both the antenna and the ground as they alternate back and forth. When you receive radio waves with a long wire, they go into the wire and through the antenna coil, and then into earth. They then reverse direction and go from earth to the antenna. They do this as many times as the frequency which you are tuned into. Battery radios will not work without a ground. Neither will crystal radios. The only reason why AC radios will is because there is also capacitive coupling through the power transformer. It is not enough to maximize ground coupling, though, so a condenser is often used to improve things, how ever minor the improvement may be. The condenser is connnected from the line cord to the chassis.

Battery radios with loop antennas work without grounds because they have a closed circuit. The radiation from the transmitter antenna and the earth induce currents in the antenna, which has its circuit closed by the tuning condenser. Still, both AC and battery radios with loop antennas can be improved by connecting them to an auxilary source of ground.

Now, to reduce radio interference from the line cord, a condenser is connected ACROSS THE AC CORD. The condenser that goes from the cord to the chassis is NOT for reduction of interference. It is more likely to pipe in more interference.

I know that most won't take the time to read this, though, and so they won't have any understanding as to what is going on, and so I'll see the same questions and misinformation over and over again.

Thomas

12/8/2006 7:15:33 PMZ-
:Yeah, but when you refer to the chassis as ground, people confuse things and ask questions like why do you have to connect a condenser from the chassis to the line cord for an RF ground when the chassis already is ground. In other words, "why do you have to connect a ground to a ground?"


The line cord is not ground, you should be able to explain that in Layman's terms. I thought the definition I just posted would clarify things, seems not.

:Truth is, the chassis isn't ground.


The chassis IS ground unless it is entirely isolated from the circuit. Most radios I know do not have an isolated chassis, the chassis IS the ground, i.e. zero reference. Do you own a car ? What do you call the negative on the car's chassis ? GROUND !

Ground and earth ground are not the same thing.

Unless you wish to redefine electricity and all the definitions related to this science.

:The only thing that's ground is the ground itself. The only electrical thing that's ground electrically is anything that connects to the earth.

Nope. A ground does NOT have to be earthed. A ground is a common _reference_. Then, you can add an earth ground.

:If, after you thoroughly understand how everything works, you want to refer to the chassis as ground, then do so, but keep it to yourself


I do understand quite well the concept of electricity and electronics ? Do you have any technical background at all ? I read your posts and all you can do is generalize. I can't find any proper/correct terminology in any of your post. If you had taken _any_ technical course, you'd know all that.

What's that compulsion to always attack my post with personal comments and snide remarks since day one ?


:...because it confuses everyone else.


I doubt using proper terminology would/should confuse anyone.


: A CHASSIS AND THE EARTH ARE TWO ENTIRELY DIFFERENT THINGS.


We are talking about "ground", not "earth ground" so far. Please read on the subject in just about any good electrical or electronic books (I can suggest a few, Henney's comes to mind, simple to read) on the subject.

: but a chassis 'ground' is not at all the same as an earth 'ground'.


Now we agree. A chassis IS ground and earth is something different (usually called earth ground).

http://www.nostalgiaair.org/PagesByModel/368/M0025368.pdf

Here's an example: Look at page 3, far right, the little symbol..."Denotes Chassis Ground"...There is also a small cap (C21) going from one side of the line to the...chassis ground.

Kind regards,
Z-

12/8/2006 6:01:27 PMDoug Criner
Old radios didn't have polarized power plugs. So, you can't really say the power switch was originally on the hot leg or the neutral leg - depends on how you would choose to plug them in.

: I am also concerned that the chassis has a potential on it due to the line caps as well as the fact that a lot of the radios had the power switch on the ground leg and putting the caps before the switch.
. PL

12/8/2006 6:28:30 PMThomas Dermody
Regarding AC radios, what you say is definitely true. One might suspect that the switched side of the cord was supposed to be the cold side, though, since this was usually the side that the chassis condenser connected to, and you'd think that the manufacturer would want the chassis to be cold (the radio works best that way, anyway--less interference and hum). Also, with AC/DC radios, the chassis or B- side is almost always the switched side, which leads me to believe that this side is the cold side. I am only assuming, though. Once again, the radio also performs better with this side plugged in as cold.

Also, typically, when electrical codes were followed, the wire with the tracer or rib (if rubber or plastic) was considered the "cold" wire, and was usually connected to the switched side of the radio. This wasn't always the case. I have seen literature where the tracer was established as the "hot" side. In most (if not all) of my radios the ribbed or tracer wire was connected to the switch, as well as the chassis condenser, if a chassis condenser is used. I have replaced most of the cords, so I can no longer use this as a reference except by memory.

Thomas



© 1989-2025, Nostalgia Air