There are other modern reuses of vintage names: Crosley portable record players, for example. For some reason, this bothers me, but I can't explain exactly why. I assume that it's all legal - that perhaps the old trademarks were sold off or have expired.
But why would any manufacturer or retailer, with an ounce of pride, not want to put its own name on what it sells? Is the purpose to somehow convey the misleading notion that the CD/DVD player is designed and built by a modern descendent of the "real" Philco? And that there is a bona fide Philco organization standing behind the product?
In a word Doug, yes. It's the "nostalgia" cachet that these off-shore, pan-asian companies market and bank on to sell these very poor quality transistorized units that died very quickly. This is evidenced by the number of emails and website searched
s I get about "...my Philco(sic) CD/DVD/Recordplayer/Combo thing is dead..." etc, etc, etc....
Chuck
About the only original companies are Toshiba, Sony, Panasonic, AIWA, and some other Japanese brands that have been around for 50, 60, or more years. They are fairly good brands. It is a shame that there are no good American brands left.
Maybe Emerson is still the same company. Who knows. I doublt it.
Probably the only company that's still the same company (and still a big monopoly) is GE.
T.
Hi Tom,
When did Zenith bite the dust? Emerson went down when I was a kid.
All the Best,
Bill
T.