| :Thanks again. :It is still the original speaker intact, and all electrolytics are new. Stations come in good with lots of volume, nice tone, even a few shortwave stations too. That capacitor is deeply buried so I will measure resistors first. : ::Sir Brian. . . . . . :: :: :: ::Ab-so -rootley, on the possibility of C38 leaking and pulling down the Sub B+ level a bit. :: :: ::What you might try is to monitor the Sub B+ at the origin of its tap off at voltage divider bridge of R14-R17. :: :: ::Then you unplug 6K8 and 6K7 tubes to see what the sub B+ rises up to without loading . . . Then plug in one tube at a time and recheck the voltage level. One of those individual tubes will have loaded and pulled the voltage down a wee bit more than the other. :: :: ::I am thinking that it will be ~ 12 ma consumption for the 6K8 and ~11 ma for the 6K7. Seems like C38 is over to the side of the chassis and down under a lip. :: :: ::That C38 would have to be seriously leaky down in the k's of resistance to be effecting us on that degree of a voltage drop. :: :: ::The potential other thing aparrent on that supply line, is leakage within the the C41---5 ufd filter , which we hope that you have already replaced with a good unit. :: :: ::You did not make any reference to the 1k power res sub for a speaker field coil, so I guess that situation was on somebody elses set. And, you also still have the original speaker in your unit, and no one has subbed in a speaker with a lower value of field coil reisistance / inductance. :: :: ::BTW have you ever heard stations picked on this radio ? That initially being even before you started changing parts, considering that you made an initial g r a d u a l power up, thru a Variac, to see if there were initially any power electrolytic filter issues in the unit. :: :: ::2 questions included. :: :: ::Standing by . . . :: :: :: :: ::73's de Edd :: :: ::  :: |